IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0150424.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Random Forest to Improve the Downscaling of Global Livestock Census Data

Author

Listed:
  • Gaëlle Nicolas
  • Timothy P Robinson
  • G R William Wint
  • Giulia Conchedda
  • Giuseppina Cinardi
  • Marius Gilbert

Abstract

Large scale, high-resolution global data on farm animal distributions are essential for spatially explicit assessments of the epidemiological, environmental and socio-economic impacts of the livestock sector. This has been the major motivation behind the development of the Gridded Livestock of the World (GLW) database, which has been extensively used since its first publication in 2007. The database relies on a downscaling methodology whereby census counts of animals in sub-national administrative units are redistributed at the level of grid cells as a function of a series of spatial covariates. The recent upgrade of GLW1 to GLW2 involved automating the processing, improvement of input data, and downscaling at a spatial resolution of 1 km per cell (5 km per cell in the earlier version). The underlying statistical methodology, however, remained unchanged. In this paper, we evaluate new methods to downscale census data with a higher accuracy and increased processing efficiency. Two main factors were evaluated, based on sample census datasets of cattle in Africa and chickens in Asia. First, we implemented and evaluated Random Forest models (RF) instead of stratified regressions. Second, we investigated whether models that predicted the number of animals per rural person (per capita) could provide better downscaled estimates than the previous approach that predicted absolute densities (animals per km2). RF models consistently provided better predictions than the stratified regressions for both continents and species. The benefit of per capita over absolute density models varied according to the species and continent. In addition, different technical options were evaluated to reduce the processing time while maintaining their predictive power. Future GLW runs (GLW 3.0) will apply the new RF methodology with optimized modelling options. The potential benefit of per capita models will need to be further investigated with a better distinction between rural and agricultural populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Gaëlle Nicolas & Timothy P Robinson & G R William Wint & Giulia Conchedda & Giuseppina Cinardi & Marius Gilbert, 2016. "Using Random Forest to Improve the Downscaling of Global Livestock Census Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0150424
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150424
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0150424
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0150424&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0150424?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Weston Anderson & Seth Guikema & Ben Zaitchik & William Pan, 2014. "Methods for Estimating Population Density in Data-Limited Areas: Evaluating Regression and Tree-Based Models in Peru," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(7), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Marius Gilbert & Giulia Conchedda & Thomas P Van Boeckel & Giuseppina Cinardi & Catherine Linard & Gaëlle Nicolas & Weerapong Thanapongtharm & Laura D'Aietti & William Wint & Scott H Newman & Timothy , 2015. "Income Disparities and the Global Distribution of Intensively Farmed Chicken and Pigs," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-14, July.
    3. Forrest R Stevens & Andrea E Gaughan & Catherine Linard & Andrew J Tatem, 2015. "Disaggregating Census Data for Population Mapping Using Random Forests with Remotely-Sensed and Ancillary Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-22, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leight, Jessica & Awonon, Josué & Pedehombga, Abdoulaye & Ganaba, Rasmané & Gelli, Aulo, 2022. "How light is too light touch: The effect of a short training-based intervention on household poultry production in Burkina Faso," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    2. Olivia D'Aoust & Julius Gunneman & Karishma V. Patel & Caroline Tassot, 2022. "Cash in the City," World Bank Publications - Reports 37443, The World Bank Group.
    3. Romain Espinosa & Damian Tago & Nicolas Treich, 2020. "Infectious Diseases and Meat Production," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 76(4), pages 1019-1044, August.
    4. Coll, Carmen & Sánchez, Elena, 2020. "Epidemic spreading by indirect transmission in a compartmental farm," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 386(C).
    5. Chaiban, Celia & Biscio, Christophe & Thanapongtharm, Weerapong & Tildesley, Michael & Xiao, Xiangming & Robinson, Timothy P. & Vanwambeke, Sophie O. & Gilbert, Marius, 2019. "Point pattern simulation modelling of extensive and intensive chicken farming in Thailand: Accounting for clustering and landscape characteristics," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 335-344.
    6. Martin C. Parlasca & Matin Qaim, 2022. "Meat Consumption and Sustainability," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 14(1), pages 17-41, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0150424. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.