IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0150243.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting Market Impact Costs Using Nonparametric Machine Learning Models

Author

Listed:
  • Saerom Park
  • Jaewook Lee
  • Youngdoo Son

Abstract

Market impact cost is the most significant portion of implicit transaction costs that can reduce the overall transaction cost, although it cannot be measured directly. In this paper, we employed the state-of-the-art nonparametric machine learning models: neural networks, Bayesian neural network, Gaussian process, and support vector regression, to predict market impact cost accurately and to provide the predictive model that is versatile in the number of variables. We collected a large amount of real single transaction data of US stock market from Bloomberg Terminal and generated three independent input variables. As a result, most nonparametric machine learning models outperformed a-state-of-the-art benchmark parametric model such as I-star model in four error measures. Although these models encounter certain difficulties in separating the permanent and temporary cost directly, nonparametric machine learning models can be good alternatives in reducing transaction costs by considerably improving in prediction performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Saerom Park & Jaewook Lee & Youngdoo Son, 2016. "Predicting Market Impact Costs Using Nonparametric Machine Learning Models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-13, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0150243
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150243
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0150243
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0150243&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0150243?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean-Philippe Bouchaud & Yuval Gefen & Marc Potters & Matthieu Wyart, 2004. "Fluctuations and response in financial markets: the subtle nature of 'random' price changes," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 176-190.
    2. Takashi Kato, 2009. "An Optimal Execution Problem with Market Impact," Papers 0907.3282, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2014.
    3. Hutchinson, James M & Lo, Andrew W & Poggio, Tomaso, 1994. "A Nonparametric Approach to Pricing and Hedging Derivative Securities via Learning Networks," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 49(3), pages 851-889, July.
    4. Gur Huberman & Werner Stanzl, 2005. "Optimal Liquidity Trading," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 9(2), pages 165-200.
    5. Jacob A. Bikker & Laura Spierdijk & Roy P. M. M. Hoevenaars & Pieter Jelle Van der Sluis, 2008. "Forecasting market impact costs and identifying expensive trades," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(1), pages 21-39.
    6. Takashi Kato, 2014. "An optimal execution problem with market impact," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 695-732, July.
    7. M. Rusydi & Sardar M. N. Islam, 2007. "Market Models and Applications," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Quantitative Exchange Rate Economics in Developing Countries, chapter 4, pages 45-62, Palgrave Macmillan.
    8. Nataliya Bershova & Dmitry Rakhlin, 2013. "The non-linear market impact of large trades: evidence from buy-side order flow," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(11), pages 1759-1778, November.
    9. Fabrizio Lillo & J. Doyne Farmer & Rosario N. Mantegna, 2003. "Master curve for price-impact function," Nature, Nature, vol. 421(6919), pages 129-130, January.
    10. Jacob A. Bikker & Laura Spierdijk & Roy P. M. M. Hoevenaars & Pieter Jelle Van der Sluis, 2008. "Forecasting market impact costs and identifying expensive trades," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(1), pages 21-39.
    11. Wun-Hua Chen & Jen-Ying Shih & Soushan Wu, 2006. "Comparison of support-vector machines and back propagation neural networks in forecasting the six major Asian stock markets," International Journal of Electronic Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1), pages 49-67.
    12. Yalin Gündüz & Marliese Uhrig-Homburg, 2011. "Predicting credit default swap prices with financial and pure data-driven approaches," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(12), pages 1709-1727.
    13. Xavier Gabaix & Parameswaran Gopikrishnan & Vasiliki Plerou & H. Eugene Stanley, 2003. "A theory of power-law distributions in financial market fluctuations," Nature, Nature, vol. 423(6937), pages 267-270, May.
    14. Bikker, Jacob A. & Spierdijk, Laura & van der Sluis, Pieter Jelle, 2007. "Market impact costs of institutional equity trades," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 974-1000, October.
    15. Kissell, Robert, 2013. "The Science of Algorithmic Trading and Portfolio Management," Elsevier Monographs, Elsevier, edition 1, number 9780124016897.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anastasia Bugaenko, 2020. "Empirical Study of Market Impact Conditional on Order-Flow Imbalance," Papers 2004.08290, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2020.
    2. Bartram, Söhnke & Branke, Jürgen & Motahari, Mehrshad, 2020. "Artificial Intelligence in Asset Management," CEPR Discussion Papers 14525, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    3. Hyungjin Ko & Jaewook Lee & Junyoung Byun & Bumho Son & Saerom Park, 2019. "Loss-Driven Adversarial Ensemble Deep Learning for On-Line Time Series Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-24, June.
    4. Kavitha Ganesan & Udhayakumar Annamalai & Nagarajan Deivanayagampillai, 2019. "An integrated new threshold FCMs Markov chain based forecasting model for analyzing the power of stock trading trend," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 5(1), pages 1-19, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kashyap, Ravi, 2020. "David vs Goliath (You against the Markets), A dynamic programming approach to separate the impact and timing of trading costs," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 545(C).
    2. Jean-Philippe Bouchaud & Julien Kockelkoren & Marc Potters, 2006. "Random walks, liquidity molasses and critical response in financial markets," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(2), pages 115-123.
    3. Juan C. Henao-Londono & Sebastian M. Krause & Thomas Guhr, 2021. "Price response functions and spread impact in correlated financial markets," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 94(4), pages 1-20, April.
    4. J. Doyne Farmer & Austin Gerig & Fabrizio Lillo & Henri Waelbroeck, 2013. "How efficiency shapes market impact," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(11), pages 1743-1758, November.
    5. Philipp Weber & Bernd Rosenow, 2006. "Large stock price changes: volume or liquidity?," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 7-14.
    6. Wei-Xing Zhou, 2012. "Universal price impact functions of individual trades in an order-driven market," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(8), pages 1253-1263, June.
    7. Olivier Guéant, 2016. "The Financial Mathematics of Market Liquidity: From Optimal Execution to Market Making," Post-Print hal-01393136, HAL.
    8. Emilio Said, 2022. "Market Impact: Empirical Evidence, Theory and Practice," Working Papers hal-03668669, HAL.
    9. Cebiroglu, Gökhan & Hautsch, Nikolaus & Walsh, Christopher, 2019. "Revisiting the stealth trading hypothesis: Does time-varying liquidity explain the size-effect?," CFS Working Paper Series 625, Center for Financial Studies (CFS).
    10. Marcus Lim & Richard Coggins, 2005. "The immediate price impact of trades on the Australian Stock Exchange," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(4), pages 365-377.
    11. Fabrizio Lillo, 2021. "Order flow and price formation," Papers 2105.00521, arXiv.org.
    12. Emilio Said, 2022. "Market Impact: Empirical Evidence, Theory and Practice," Papers 2205.07385, arXiv.org.
    13. Fukker, Gábor & Kaijser, Michiel & Mingarelli, Luca & Sydow, Matthias, 2022. "Contagion from market price impact: a price-at-risk perspective," Working Paper Series 2692, European Central Bank.
    14. Xiaoyue Li & John M. Mulvey, 2023. "Optimal Portfolio Execution in a Regime-switching Market with Non-linear Impact Costs: Combining Dynamic Program and Neural Network," Papers 2306.08809, arXiv.org.
    15. Fr'ed'eric Bucci & Michael Benzaquen & Fabrizio Lillo & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud, 2019. "Slow decay of impact in equity markets: insights from the ANcerno database," Papers 1901.05332, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2019.
    16. Yamamoto, Ryuichi, 2019. "Dynamic Predictor Selection And Order Splitting In A Limit Order Market," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(5), pages 1757-1792, July.
    17. Thibault Jaisson, 2014. "Market impact as anticipation of the order flow imbalance," Papers 1402.1288, arXiv.org.
    18. Weibing Huang & Charles-Albert Lehalle & Mathieu Rosenbaum, 2015. "Simulating and Analyzing Order Book Data: The Queue-Reactive Model," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(509), pages 107-122, March.
    19. Martin D. Gould & Mason A. Porter & Stacy Williams & Mark McDonald & Daniel J. Fenn & Sam D. Howison, 2010. "Limit Order Books," Papers 1012.0349, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2013.
    20. Takashi Kato, 2014. "VWAP Execution as an Optimal Strategy," Papers 1408.6118, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2017.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0150243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.