IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0149654.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selective Efficacy of Static and Dynamic Imagery in Different States of Physical Fatigue

Author

Listed:
  • Thiago Ferreira Dias Kanthack
  • Aymeric Guillot
  • Leandro Ricardo Altimari
  • Susana Nunez Nagy
  • Christian Collet
  • Franck Di Rienzo

Abstract

There is compelling evidence that motor imagery contributes to improved motor performance, and recent work showed that dynamic motor imagery (dMI) might provide additional benefits by comparison with traditional MI practice. However, the efficacy of motor imagery in different states of physical fatigue remains largely unknown, especially as imagery accuracy may be hampered by the physical fatigue states elicited by training. We investigated the effect of static motor imagery (sMI) and dMI on free-throw accuracy in 10 high-level basketball athletes, both in a non-fatigued state (Experiment 1) and immediately after an incremental running test completed until exhaustion (20m shuttle run-test–Experiment 2). We collected perceived exhaustion and heart rate to quantify the subjective experience of fatigue and energy expenditure. We found that dMI brought better shooting performance than sMI, except when athletes were physically exhausted. These findings shed light on the conditions eliciting optimal use of sMI and dMI. In particular, considering that the current physical state affects body representation, performing dMI under fatigue may result in mismatches between actual and predicted body states.

Suggested Citation

  • Thiago Ferreira Dias Kanthack & Aymeric Guillot & Leandro Ricardo Altimari & Susana Nunez Nagy & Christian Collet & Franck Di Rienzo, 2016. "Selective Efficacy of Static and Dynamic Imagery in Different States of Physical Fatigue," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0149654
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149654
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0149654
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0149654&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0149654?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gabor Csataljay & Peter O’Donoghue & Mike Hughes & Henriette Dancs, 2009. "Performance indicators that distinguish winning and losing teams in basketball," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 60-66, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lorenzo Gasperi & Daniele Conte & Anthony Leicht & Miguel-Ángel Gómez-Ruano, 2020. "Game Related Statistics Discriminate National and Foreign Players According to Playing Position and Team Ability in the Women’s Basketball EuroLeague," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-10, July.
    2. Assanskiy, Artur & Shaposhnikov, Daniil & Tylkin, Igor & Vasiliev, Gleb, 2022. "Prove them wrong: Do professional athletes perform better when facing their former clubs?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    3. Zsombor Zilinyi & Ágoston Nagy & Szilvia Borbély & Tamás Sterbenz, 2022. "Bounded Rationality and Heuristics: Do We Only Need to Score in Order to Win Individual Awards in Basketball?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-9, February.
    4. Zoltan Boros & Kata Toth & Gergely Csurilla & Tamas Sterbenz, 2022. "A Comparison of 5v5 and 3x3 Men’s Basketball Regarding Shot Selection and Efficiency," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-12, November.
    5. Radivoj Mandić & Saša Jakovljević & Frane Erčulj & Erik Štrumbelj, 2019. "Trends in NBA and Euroleague basketball: Analysis and comparison of statistical data from 2000 to 2017," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, October.
    6. Tomasz Zając & Kazimierz Mikołajec & Paweł Chmura & Marek Konefał & Michał Krzysztofik & Piotr Makar, 2023. "Long-Term Trends in Shooting Performance in the NBA: An Analysis of Two- and Three-Point Shooting across 40 Consecutive Seasons," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-12, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0149654. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.