IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0135947.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multimorbidity and Patient Safety Incidents in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Panagioti
  • Jonathan Stokes
  • Aneez Esmail
  • Peter Coventry
  • Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi
  • Rahul Alam
  • Peter Bower

Abstract

Background: Multimorbidity is increasingly prevalent and represents a major challenge in primary care. Patients with multimorbidity are potentially more likely to experience safety incidents due to the complexity of their needs and frequency of their interactions with health services. However, rigorous syntheses of the link between patient safety incidents and multimorbidity are not available. This review examined the relationship between multimorbidity and patient safety incidents in primary care. Methods: We followed our published protocol (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42014007434). Medline, Embase and CINAHL were searched up to May 2015. Study design and quality were assessed. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated for the associations between multimorbidity and two categories of patient safety outcomes: ‘active patient safety incidents’ (such as adverse drug events and medical complications) and ‘precursors of safety incidents’ (such as prescription errors, medication non-adherence, poor quality of care and diagnostic errors). Meta-analyses using random effects models were undertaken. Results: Eighty six relevant comparisons from 75 studies were included in the analysis. Meta-analysis demonstrated that physical-mental multimorbidity was associated with an increased risk for ‘active patient safety incidents’ (OR = 2.39, 95% CI = 1.40 to 3.38) and ‘precursors of safety incidents’ (OR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.36 to 2.03). Physical multimorbidity was associated with an increased risk for active safety incidents (OR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.45 to 1.80) but was not associated with precursors of safety incidents (OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.90 to 1.13). Statistical heterogeneity was high and the methodological quality of the studies was generally low. Conclusions: The association between multimorbidity and patient safety is complex, and varies by type of multimorbidity and type of safety incident. Our analyses suggest that multimorbidity involving mental health may be a key driver of safety incidents, which has important implication for the design and targeting of interventions to improve safety. High quality studies examining the mechanisms of patient safety incidents in patients with multimorbidity are needed, with the goal of promoting effective service delivery and ameliorating threats to safety in this group of patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Panagioti & Jonathan Stokes & Aneez Esmail & Peter Coventry & Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi & Rahul Alam & Peter Bower, 2015. "Multimorbidity and Patient Safety Incidents in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-30, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0135947
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135947
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0135947
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0135947&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0135947?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anderson, Michael & O'Neill, Ciaran & Macleod Clark, Jill & Street, Andrew & Woods, Michael & Johnston-Webber, Charlotte & Charlesworth, Anita & Whyte, Moira & Foster, Margaret & Majeed, Azeem & Pitch, 2021. "Securing a sustainable and fit-for-purpose UK health and care workforce," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 110809, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Kurt C. Stange & Anne Gaglioti & James Bindas, 2022. "Integrated, Personalized Care for Older People," Journal of Elder Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(2), pages 23-78, September.
    3. Jonathan Stokes & Maria Panagioti & Rahul Alam & Kath Checkland & Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi & Peter Bower, 2015. "Effectiveness of Case Management for 'At Risk' Patients in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-42, July.
    4. Alexander Akologo & Aaron Asibi Abuosi & Emmanuel Anongeba Anaba, 2019. "A cross-sectional survey on patient safety culture among healthcare providers in the Upper East region of Ghana," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-13, August.
    5. Stokes, Jonathan & Struckmann, Verena & Kristensen, Søren Rud & Fuchs, Sabine & van Ginneken, Ewout & Tsiachristas, Apostolos & Rutten van Mölken, Maureen & Sutton, Matt, 2018. "Towards incentivising integration: A typology of payments for integrated care," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(9), pages 963-969.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0135947. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.