IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0129037.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Short Guide to the Climatic Variables of the Last Glacial Maximum for Biogeographers

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Varela
  • Matheus S Lima-Ribeiro
  • Levi Carina Terribile

Abstract

Ecological niche models are widely used for mapping the distribution of species during the last glacial maximum (LGM). Although the selection of the variables and General Circulation Models (GCMs) used for constructing those maps determine the model predictions, we still lack a discussion about which variables and which GCM should be included in the analysis and why. Here, we analyzed the climatic predictions for the LGM of 9 different GCMs in order to help biogeographers to select their GCMs and climatic layers for mapping the species ranges in the LGM. We 1) map the discrepancies between the climatic predictions of the nine GCMs available for the LGM, 2) analyze the similarities and differences between the GCMs and group them to help researchers choose the appropriate GCMs for calibrating and projecting their ecological niche models (ENM) during the LGM, and 3) quantify the agreement of the predictions for each bioclimatic variable to help researchers avoid the environmental variables with a poor consensus between models. Our results indicate that, in absolute values, GCMs have a strong disagreement in their temperature predictions for temperate areas, while the uncertainties for the precipitation variables are in the tropics. In spite of the discrepancies between model predictions, temperature variables (BIO1-BIO11) are highly correlated between models. Precipitation variables (BIO12- BIO19) show no correlation between models, and specifically, BIO14 (precipitation of the driest month) and BIO15 (Precipitation Seasonality (Coefficient of Variation)) show the highest level of discrepancy between GCMs. Following our results, we strongly recommend the use of different GCMs for constructing or projecting ENMs, particularly when predicting the distribution of species that inhabit the tropics and the temperate areas of the Northern and Southern Hemispheres, because climatic predictions for those areas vary greatly among GCMs. We also recommend the exclusion of BIO14 and BIO15 from ENMs because those variables show a high level of discrepancy between GCMs. Thus, by excluding them, we decrease the level of uncertainty of our predictions. All the climatic layers produced for this paper are freely available in http://ecoclimate.org/.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Varela & Matheus S Lima-Ribeiro & Levi Carina Terribile, 2015. "A Short Guide to the Climatic Variables of the Last Glacial Maximum for Biogeographers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-15, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0129037
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0129037
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0129037&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0129037?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jácome, Gabriel & Vilela, Paulina & Yoo, ChangKyoo, 2019. "Present and future incidence of dengue fever in Ecuador nationwide and coast region scale using species distribution modeling for climate variability’s effect," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 400(C), pages 60-72.
    2. Miguel de Luis & Julio Álvarez-Jiménez & Francisco Javier Rejos & Carmen Bartolomé, 2020. "Using species distribution models to locate the potential cradles of the allopolyploid Gypsophila bermejoi G. López (Caryophyllaceae)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Nathan DeMaagd & Michael J. Roberts, 2020. "How Will Climate Change Affect Water Demand? Evidence from Hawaii Microclimates," Working Papers 202020, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Department of Economics.
    4. Nathan DeMaagd & Michael J. Roberts, 2020. "How Will Climate Change Affect Water Demand? Evidence from Hawai‘i Microclimates," Working Papers 2020-2, University of Hawaii Economic Research Organization, University of Hawaii at Manoa.
    5. Sillero, Neftalí & Arenas-Castro, Salvador & Enriquez‐Urzelai, Urtzi & Vale, Cândida Gomes & Sousa-Guedes, Diana & Martínez-Freiría, Fernando & Real, Raimundo & Barbosa, A.Márcia, 2021. "Want to model a species niche? A step-by-step guideline on correlative ecological niche modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 456(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0129037. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.