IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0113791.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A New Perspective on Sexual Mixing among Men Who Have Sex with Men by Body Image

Author

Listed:
  • Ka-Kit Leung
  • Horas T H Wong
  • Claire M Naftalin
  • Shui Shan Lee

Abstract

Background: “Casual sex” is seldom as non-selective and random as it may sound. During each sexual encounter, people consciously and unconsciously seek their casual sex partners according to different attributes. Influential to a sexual network, research focusing on quantifying the effects of physical appearance on sexual network has been sparse. Methods: We evaluated the application of Log odds score (LOD) to assess the mixing patterns of 326 men who have sex with men (MSM) in Hong Kong in their networking of casual sex partners by Body Image Type (BIT). This involved an analysis of 1,196 respondents-casual sex partner pairs. Seven BITs were used in the study: Bear, Chubby, Slender, Lean toned, Muscular, Average and Other. Results: A hierarchical pattern was observed in the preference of MSM for casual sex partners by the latter's BIT. Overall, Muscular men were most preferred, followed by Lean toned while the least preferred was Slender, as illustrated by LOD going down along the hierarchy in the same direction. Marked avoidance was found between men who self-identified as Chubby and men of Other body type (within-group-LOD: 1.25–2.89; between-group-LOD:

Suggested Citation

  • Ka-Kit Leung & Horas T H Wong & Claire M Naftalin & Shui Shan Lee, 2014. "A New Perspective on Sexual Mixing among Men Who Have Sex with Men by Body Image," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-5, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0113791
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113791
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0113791
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0113791&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0113791?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas, Lyn C., 2009. "Consumer Credit Models: Pricing, Profit and Portfolios," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199232130.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christa N. Gibbs & Benedict Guttman-Kenney & Donghoon Lee & Scott Nelson & Wilbert Van der Klaauw & Jialan Wang, 2024. "Consumer Credit Reporting Data," Staff Reports 1114, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
    2. R T Stewart, 2011. "A profit-based scoring system in consumer credit: making acquisition decisions for credit cards," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(9), pages 1719-1725, September.
    3. So, Mee Chi & Thomas, Lyn C. & Huang, Bo, 2016. "Lending decisions with limits on capital available: The polygamous marriage problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(2), pages 407-416.
    4. M Malik & L C Thomas, 2010. "Modelling credit risk of portfolio of consumer loans," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(3), pages 411-420, March.
    5. Douw Gerbrand Breed & Tanja Verster & Willem D. Schutte & Naeem Siddiqi, 2019. "Developing an Impairment Loss Given Default Model Using Weighted Logistic Regression Illustrated on a Secured Retail Bank Portfolio," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Raffaella Calabrese & Galina Andreeva & Jake Ansell, 2019. "“Birds of a Feather” Fail Together: Exploring the Nature of Dependency in SME Defaults," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(1), pages 71-84, January.
    7. Dendramis, Y. & Tzavalis, E. & Varthalitis, P. & Athanasiou, E., 2020. "Predicting default risk under asymmetric binary link functions," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 1039-1056.
    8. José Fernando Moreno Gutiérrez & Luis Fernando Melo Velandia, 2011. "Pronóstico de incumplimientos de pago mediante máquinas de vectores de soporte: una aproximación inicial a la gestión del riesgo de crédito," Borradores de Economia 677, Banco de la Republica de Colombia.
    9. Fahner, Gerald, 2012. "Estimating causal effects of credit decisions," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 248-260.
    10. Dimitris Andriosopoulos & Michalis Doumpos & Panos M. Pardalos & Constantin Zopounidis, 2019. "Computational approaches and data analytics in financial services: A literature review," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(10), pages 1581-1599, October.
    11. David Pla-Santamaria & Mila Bravo & Javier Reig-Mullor & Francisco Salas-Molina, 2021. "A multicriteria approach to manage credit risk under strict uncertainty," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 29(2), pages 494-523, July.
    12. Laura Blattner & Scott Nelson, 2021. "How Costly is Noise? Data and Disparities in Consumer Credit," Papers 2105.07554, arXiv.org.
    13. Maha Bakoben & Tony Bellotti & Niall Adams, 2017. "Identification of Credit Risk Based on Cluster Analysis of Account Behaviours," Papers 1706.07466, arXiv.org.
    14. So, Meko M.C. & Thomas, Lyn C., 2011. "Modelling the profitability of credit cards by Markov decision processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 212(1), pages 123-130, July.
    15. Arno Botha & Conrad Beyers & Pieter de Villiers, 2020. "Simulation-based optimisation of the timing of loan recovery across different portfolios," Papers 2009.11064, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2021.
    16. Gigliarano, Chiara & Figini, Silvia & Muliere, Pietro, 2014. "Making classifier performance comparisons when ROC curves intersect," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 300-312.
    17. Igor Livshits & James C. Mac Gee & Michèle Tertilt, 2016. "The Democratization of Credit and the Rise in Consumer Bankruptcies," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 83(4), pages 1673-1710.
    18. Lei Lu & Jianxing Wei & Weixing Wu & Yi Zhou, 2023. "Pricing strategies in BigTech lending: Evidence from China," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 52(2), pages 333-374, June.
    19. Douw Gerbrand Breed & Niel van Jaarsveld & Carsten Gerken & Tanja Verster & Helgard Raubenheimer, 2021. "Development of an Impairment Point in Time Probability of Default Model for Revolving Retail Credit Products: South African Case Study," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-22, November.
    20. Zhixin Liu & Ping He & Bo Chen, 2019. "A Markov decision model for consumer term-loan collections," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 1043-1064, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0113791. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.