IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v249y2016i2p407-416.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lending decisions with limits on capital available: The polygamous marriage problem

Author

Listed:
  • So, Mee Chi
  • Thomas, Lyn C.
  • Huang, Bo

Abstract

In order to stimulate or subdue the economy, banking regulators have sought to impose caps or floors on individual bank's lending to certain types of borrowers. This paper shows that the resultant decision problem for a bank of which potential borrower to accept is a variant of the marriage/secretary problem where one can accept several applicants. The paper solves the decision problem using dynamic programming. We give results on the form of the optimal lending problem and counter examples to further “reasonable” conjectures which do not hold in the general case. By solving numerical examples we show the potential loss of profit and the inconsistency in the lending decision that are caused by introducing floors and caps on lending. The paper also describes some other situations where the same decision occurs.

Suggested Citation

  • So, Mee Chi & Thomas, Lyn C. & Huang, Bo, 2016. "Lending decisions with limits on capital available: The polygamous marriage problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(2), pages 407-416.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:249:y:2016:i:2:p:407-416
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.01.047
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221715000673
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.01.047?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stein, William E. & Seale, Darryl A. & Rapoport, Amnon, 2003. "Analysis of heuristic solutions to the best choice problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(1), pages 140-152, November.
    2. Cyrus Derman & Gerald J. Lieberman & Sheldon M. Ross, 1972. "A Sequential Stochastic Assignment Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(7), pages 349-355, March.
    3. Anton J. Kleywegt & Jason D. Papastavrou, 1998. "The Dynamic and Stochastic Knapsack Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(1), pages 17-35, February.
    4. Chun, Young H., 1999. "Selecting the best choice in the full information group interview problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(3), pages 635-651, December.
    5. Anton J. Kleywegt & Jason D. Papastavrou, 2001. "The Dynamic and Stochastic Knapsack Problem with Random Sized Items," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(1), pages 26-41, February.
    6. Nicole Bäuerle & Jonathan Ott, 2011. "Markov Decision Processes with Average-Value-at-Risk criteria," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 74(3), pages 361-379, December.
    7. J. Preater, 1994. "On Multiple Choice Secretary Problems," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(3), pages 597-602, August.
    8. Richard Van Slyke & Yi Young, 2000. "Finite Horizon Stochastic Knapsacks with Applications to Yield Management," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(1), pages 155-172, February.
    9. W Zhuang & M Gumus & D Zhang, 2012. "A single-resource revenue management problem with random resource consumptions," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 63(9), pages 1213-1227, September.
    10. Thomas, Lyn C., 2009. "Consumer Credit Models: Pricing, Profit and Portfolios," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199232130.
    11. Gregory P. Prastacos, 1983. "Optimal Sequential Investment Decisions Under Conditions of Uncertainty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(1), pages 118-134, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. P'eter Bir'o & M'arton Gyetvai, 2021. "Online voluntary mentoring: Optimising the assignment of students and mentors," Papers 2102.06671, arXiv.org.
    2. Biró, Péter & Gyetvai, Márton, 2023. "Online voluntary mentoring: Optimising the assignment of students and mentors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(1), pages 392-405.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grace Y. Lin & Yingdong Lu & David D. Yao, 2008. "The Stochastic Knapsack Revisited: Switch-Over Policies and Dynamic Pricing," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(4), pages 945-957, August.
    2. Alexander G. Nikolaev & Sheldon H. Jacobson, 2010. "Technical Note ---Stochastic Sequential Decision-Making with a Random Number of Jobs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(4-part-1), pages 1023-1027, August.
    3. Feng, Youyi & Xiao, Baichun, 2006. "A continuous-time seat control model for single-leg flights with no-shows and optimal overbooking upper bound," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(2), pages 1298-1316, October.
    4. Pak, K. & Piersma, N., 2002. "airline revenue management," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2002-12-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    5. Pak, K. & Piersma, N., 2002. "Airline revenue management: an overview of OR techniques 1982-2001," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2002-03, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    6. Shelby Brumelle & Darius Walczak, 2003. "Dynamic Airline Revenue Management with Multiple Semi-Markov Demand," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(1), pages 137-148, February.
    7. Anton J. Kleywegt & Jason D. Papastavrou, 2001. "The Dynamic and Stochastic Knapsack Problem with Random Sized Items," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(1), pages 26-41, February.
    8. Pak, K. & Dekker, R., 2004. "Cargo Revenue Management: Bid-Prices for a 0-1 Multi Knapsack Problem," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2004-055-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    9. Alec Morton, 2006. "Structural properties of network revenue management models: An economic perspective," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(8), pages 748-760, December.
    10. Tianke Feng & Joseph C. Hartman, 2015. "The dynamic and stochastic knapsack Problem with homogeneous‐sized items and postponement options," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 62(4), pages 267-292, June.
    11. Grace Lin & Yingdong Lu & David Yao, 2007. "Stochastic Knapsack Problem Revisited: Switch-Over Policies and Dynamic Pricing," Papers 0708.1146, arXiv.org.
    12. Chen, Kai & Ross, Sheldon M., 2014. "An adaptive stochastic knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(3), pages 625-635.
    13. Adrian Lee & Sheldon Jacobson, 2011. "Sequential stochastic assignment under uncertainty: estimation and convergence," Statistical Inference for Stochastic Processes, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 21-46, February.
    14. Xuhan Tian & Junmin (Jim) Shi & Xiangtong Qi, 2022. "Stochastic Sequential Allocations for Creative Crowdsourcing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(2), pages 697-714, February.
    15. Wei Zhang & Sriram Dasu & Reza Ahmadi, 2017. "Higher Prices for Larger Quantities? Nonmonotonic Price–Quantity Relations in B2B Markets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(7), pages 2108-2126, July.
    16. Taylan İlhan & Seyed M. R. Iravani & Mark S. Daskin, 2011. "TECHNICAL NOTE---The Adaptive Knapsack Problem with Stochastic Rewards," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(1), pages 242-248, February.
    17. Keumseok Kang & J. George Shanthikumar & Kemal Altinkemer, 2016. "Postponable Acceptance and Assignment: A Stochastic Dynamic Programming Approach," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 493-508, October.
    18. Soumia Ichoua & Michel Gendreau & Jean-Yves Potvin, 2006. "Exploiting Knowledge About Future Demands for Real-Time Vehicle Dispatching," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(2), pages 211-225, May.
    19. Quante, R. & Fleischmann, M. & Meyr, H., 2009. "A Stochastic Dynamic Programming Approach to Revenue Management in a Make-to-Stock Production System," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2009-015-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    20. Clifford Stein & Van-Anh Truong & Xinshang Wang, 2020. "Advance Service Reservations with Heterogeneous Customers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(7), pages 2929-2950, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:249:y:2016:i:2:p:407-416. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.