IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0109339.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selective Use of Sequential Digital Dermoscopy Imaging Allows a Cost Reduction in the Melanoma Detection Process: A Belgian Study of Patients with a Single or a Small Number of Atypical Nevi

Author

Listed:
  • Isabelle Tromme
  • Brecht Devleesschauwer
  • Philippe Beutels
  • Pauline Richez
  • Nicolas Praet
  • Laurine Sacré
  • Liliane Marot
  • Pascal Van Eeckhout
  • Ivan Theate
  • Jean-François Baurain
  • Julien Lambert
  • Catherine Legrand
  • Luc Thomas
  • Niko Speybroeck

Abstract

Background: Dermoscopy is a technique which improves melanoma detection. Optical dermoscopy uses a handheld optical device to observe the skin lesions without recording the images. Sequential digital dermoscopy imaging (SDDI) allows storage of the pictures and their comparison over time. Few studies have compared optical dermoscopy and SDDI from an economic perspective. Objective: The present observational study focused on patients with one-to-three atypical melanocytic lesions, i.e. lesions considered as suspicious by optical dermoscopy. It aimed to calculate the “extra-costs” related to the process of melanoma detection. These extra-costs were defined as the costs of excision and pathology of benign lesions and/or the costs of follow-up by SDDI. The objective was to compare these extra-costs when using optical dermoscopy exclusively versus optical dermoscopy with selective use of SDDI. Methods: In a first group of patients, dermatologists were adequately trained in optical dermoscopy but worked without access to SDDI. They excised all suspicious lesions to rule out melanoma. In a second group, the dermatologists were trained in optical and digital dermoscopy. They had the opportunity of choosing between immediate excision or follow-up by SDDI (with delayed excision if significant change was observed). The comparison of extra-costs in both groups was made possible by a decision tree model and by the division of the extra-costs by the number of melanomas diagnosed in each group. Belgian official tariffs and charges were used. Results: The extra-costs in the first and in the second group were respectively €1,613 and €1,052 per melanoma excised. The difference was statistically significant. Conclusions: Using the Belgian official tariffs and charges, we demonstrated that the selective use of SDDI for patients with one-to-three atypical melanocytic lesions resulted in a significant cost reduction.

Suggested Citation

  • Isabelle Tromme & Brecht Devleesschauwer & Philippe Beutels & Pauline Richez & Nicolas Praet & Laurine Sacré & Liliane Marot & Pascal Van Eeckhout & Ivan Theate & Jean-François Baurain & Julien Lamber, 2014. "Selective Use of Sequential Digital Dermoscopy Imaging Allows a Cost Reduction in the Melanoma Detection Process: A Belgian Study of Patients with a Single or a Small Number of Atypical Nevi," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-9, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0109339
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109339
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0109339
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0109339&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0109339?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Helen Dakin & Sarah Wordsworth, 2013. "Cost‐Minimisation Analysis Versus Cost‐Effectiveness Analysis, Revisited," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(1), pages 22-34, January.
    2. Tromme, Isabelle & Sacre, L & Hammouch, Fatima & Legrand, Catherine & Marot, Liliane & e.a., 2012. "Availability of digital dermoscopy in daily practice dramatically reduces the number of excised melanocytic lesions: results from an observational study," LIDAM Reprints ISBA 2012024, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. El-Banna, Asmaa & Petrou, Stavros & Yiu, Hei Hang Edmund & Daher, Shahd & Forrester, Donald & Scourfield, Jonathan & Wilkins, David & Evans, Rhiannon & Turley, Ruth & Wallace, Sarah, 2021. "Systematic review of economic evaluations of children’s social care interventions," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    2. Catherine Pitt & Catherine Goodman & Kara Hanson, 2016. "Economic Evaluation in Global Perspective: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Recent Literature," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(S1), pages 9-28, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0109339. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.