IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0107713.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ungulate Vehicle Collisions in a Peri-Urban Environment: Consequences of Transportation Infrastructures Planned Assuming the Absence of Ungulates

Author

Listed:
  • Iñigo Zuberogoitia
  • Javier del Real
  • Juan José Torres
  • Luis Rodríguez
  • María Alonso
  • Jabi Zabala

Abstract

Ungulate vehicle collisions (UVC) provoke serious damage, including human casualties, and a large number of measures have been developed around the world to avoid collisions. We analyse the main factors involved in UVC in a road network built in the absence of ungulates, where mitigation structures to avoid UVC were not adequately considered. Ungulate population greatly increased during the last two decades and now Roe Deer and Wild Boars are widely distributed over the study area, but even after this increase, the road network was not adapted to avoid UVC. A total of 235 Roe Deer (RDVC) and 153 Wild Boar vehicle collisions (WBVC) were recorded between January 2008 and December 2011. We randomly selected 289 sample points (87 RDVC, 60 WBVC and 142 controls) separated by at least 500 metres from the next closest point and measured 19 variables that could potentially influence the vehicle collisions. We detected variations in the frequency of RDVC on a monthly basis, and WBVC was higher at weekends but no significant differences were detected on a monthly basis. UVC were more likely to occur at locations where sinuosity of the road, velocity, surface of shrub and deciduous forest area were greater, the presence of fences entered with positive relationship and distance to the nearest building was less. RDVC were more likely to occur at locations where timber forest area increased and distance to the nearest building decreased and WBVC was related to open fields cover and also to the presence of fences. Sinuosity and velocity entered in both cases as significant factors. Major roads, in which the traffic volume is greater and faster, caused more accidents with ungulates than secondary roads. Nowadays, the high frequency of ungulate road-kills deserves a new strategy in order to adapt infrastructure and adopt mitigation measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Iñigo Zuberogoitia & Javier del Real & Juan José Torres & Luis Rodríguez & María Alonso & Jabi Zabala, 2014. "Ungulate Vehicle Collisions in a Peri-Urban Environment: Consequences of Transportation Infrastructures Planned Assuming the Absence of Ungulates," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-11, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0107713
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107713
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0107713
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0107713&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0107713?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ascensão, Fernando & Clevenger, Anthony & Santos-Reis, Margarida & Urbano, Paulo & Jackson, Nathan, 2013. "Wildlife–vehicle collision mitigation: Is partial fencing the answer? An agent-based model approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 257(C), pages 36-43.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrius Kučas & Linas Balčiauskas, 2021. "Impact of Road Fencing on Ungulate–Vehicle Collisions and Hotspot Patterns," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Bénard, Annaëlle & Lengagne, Thierry & Bonenfant, Christophe, 2024. "Integration of animal movement into wildlife-vehicle collision models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 492(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mamboleo, Abel Ansporthy & Doscher, Crile & Paterson, Adrian, 2021. "A computational modelling approach to human-elephant interactions in the Bunda District, Tanzania," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 443(C).
    2. He, Haosen & Buchholtz, Erin & Chen, Frederick & Vogel, Susanne & Yu, Chu A.(Alex), 2022. "An agent-based model of elephant crop consumption walks using combinatorial optimization," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 464(C).
    3. Andrius Kučas & Linas Balčiauskas & Carlo Lavalle, 2023. "Identification of Urban and Wildlife Terrestrial Corridor Intersections for Planning of Wildlife-Vehicle Collision Mitigation Measures," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, March.
    4. Andrius Kučas & Linas Balčiauskas, 2021. "Roadkill-Data-Based Identification and Ranking of Mammal Habitats," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-35, May.
    5. Andrius Kučas & Linas Balčiauskas, 2021. "Impact of Road Fencing on Ungulate–Vehicle Collisions and Hotspot Patterns," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, March.
    6. Ceia-Hasse, Ana & Navarro, Laetitia M. & Borda-de-Água, Luís & Pereira, Henrique M., 2018. "Population persistence in landscapes fragmented by roads: Disentangling isolation, mortality, and the effect of dispersal," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 375(C), pages 45-53.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0107713. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.