IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0099255.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of the Potential Diagnostic Value of Serum p53 Antibody for Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Jun Zhang
  • Zhiwei Xu
  • Lingxiang Yu
  • Meilan Chen
  • Ke Li

Abstract

Background: Mutant p53 protein over-expression has been reported to induce serum antibodies against p53. We assessed the diagnostic precision of serum p53 (s-p53) antibodies for diagnosis of cancer patients and compared the positive rates of the s-p53 antibody in different types of cancers. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed and Embase, through May 31, 2012. Studies were assessed for quality using QUADAS (quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy). The positive likelihood ratio (PLR) and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) were pooled separately and compared with overall accuracy measures using diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) and Area under the curve(AUC). Meta regression and subgroup analyses were done, and heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed. Results: Of 1089 studies initially identified, 100 eligible studies with 23 different types of tumor met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis (cases = 15953, controls = 8694). However, we could conduct independent meta analysis on only 13 of 36 types of tumors. Approximately 56% (56/100) of the included studies were of high quality (QUADAS score≥8). The summary estimates for quantitative analysis of serum p53 antibody in the diagnosis of cancers were: PLR 5.75 (95% CI: 4.60–7.19), NLR 0.81 (95%CI: 0.79–0.83) and DOR 7.56 (95% CI: 6.02–9.50). However, for the 13 types of cancers on which meta-analysis was conducted, the ranges for PLR (2.33–11.05), NLR (0.74–0.97), DOR (2.86–13.80), AUC(0.29–0.81), and positive rate (4.47%–28.36%) indicated significant heterogeneity. We found that breast, colorectal, esophageal, gastric, hepatic, lymphoma, lung and ovarian cancer had relatively reasonable diagnostic accuracy. The remaining results of the five types of cancers suggested that s-p53 antibody had limited value. Conclusions: The current evidence suggests that s-p53 antibody has potential diagnostic value for cancer, especially for breast, colorectal, esophageal, gastric, hepatic, lymphoma, lung and ovarian cancer. The results showed that s-p53 antibody had high correlation with cancers.

Suggested Citation

  • Jun Zhang & Zhiwei Xu & Lingxiang Yu & Meilan Chen & Ke Li, 2014. "Assessment of the Potential Diagnostic Value of Serum p53 Antibody for Cancer: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-9, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0099255
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099255
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0099255
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0099255&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0099255?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jun Zhang & Zhiwei Xv & Xuefeng Wu & Ke Li, 2012. "Potential Diagnostic Value of Serum p53 Antibody for Detecting Esophageal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-10, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jing Li & Yang Tang & Liu Huang & Qianqian Yu & Guangyuan Hu & Xianglin Yuan, 2016. "Genetic Variants in the p14ARF/MDM2/TP53 Pathway Are Associated with the Prognosis of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated with Radical Resection," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-11, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0099255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.