IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0052896.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Potential Diagnostic Value of Serum p53 Antibody for Detecting Esophageal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Jun Zhang
  • Zhiwei Xv
  • Xuefeng Wu
  • Ke Li

Abstract

Background: Mutant p53 protein overexpression has been reported to induce serum antibodies against p53. Various studies assessing the diagnostic value of serum p53 antibody in patients with esophageal cancer remain controversial. This study aims to comprehensively and quantitatively summarize the potential diagnostic value of serum p53 antibody in esophageal cancer. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed and Embase until 31st May 2012, without language restriction. Studies were assessed for quality using QUADAS (quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy). Positive likelihood ratio (PLR) and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) were pooled separately and compared with overall accuracy measures diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and symmetric summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC). The PLR and NLR and their 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a fixed effects model according to the Mantel-Haensed method and random effects model based on the work of Der Simonian and laird, respectively. Results: Fifteen studies (cases = 1079, controls = 2260) met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. Approximately 53.33% (8/15) of the included studies were of high quality (QUADAS score≥8), which were retrospective case-control studies. The summary estimates for quantitative analysis of serum p53 antibody in the diagnosis of esophageal cancer were PLR 6.95 (95% CI: 4.77–9.51), NLR 0.75 (95%CI: 0.72–0.78) and DOR 9.65 (95%CI: 7.04–13.22). However, we found significant heterogeneity between NLRs. Conclusions: The current evidence suggests serum p53 antibody has a potential diagnostic value for esophageal cancer. However, its discrimination power is not perfect because of low sensitivity. Impact: These results suggest that s-p53-antibody may be useful for monitoring residual tumor cells and for aiding in the selection of candidates for less invasive treatment procedures because of the high specificity of s-p53-antibody. Further studies may need to identify patterns of multiple biomarkers to further increase the power of EC detection.

Suggested Citation

  • Jun Zhang & Zhiwei Xv & Xuefeng Wu & Ke Li, 2012. "Potential Diagnostic Value of Serum p53 Antibody for Detecting Esophageal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-10, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0052896
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052896
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0052896
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0052896&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0052896?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jun Zhang & Zhiwei Xu & Lingxiang Yu & Meilan Chen & Ke Li, 2014. "Assessment of the Potential Diagnostic Value of Serum p53 Antibody for Cancer: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-9, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0052896. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.