IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0093250.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deep Belief Networks Learn Context Dependent Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Florian Raudies
  • Eric A Zilli
  • Michael E Hasselmo

Abstract

With the goal of understanding behavioral mechanisms of generalization, we analyzed the ability of neural networks to generalize across context. We modeled a behavioral task where the correct responses to a set of specific sensory stimuli varied systematically across different contexts. The correct response depended on the stimulus (A,B,C,D) and context quadrant (1,2,3,4). The possible 16 stimulus-context combinations were associated with one of two responses (X,Y), one of which was correct for half of the combinations. The correct responses varied symmetrically across contexts. This allowed responses to previously unseen stimuli (probe stimuli) to be generalized from stimuli that had been presented previously. By testing the simulation on two or more stimuli that the network had never seen in a particular context, we could test whether the correct response on the novel stimuli could be generated based on knowledge of the correct responses in other contexts. We tested this generalization capability with a Deep Belief Network (DBN), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) network, and the combination of a DBN with a linear perceptron (LP). Overall, the combination of the DBN and LP had the highest success rate for generalization.

Suggested Citation

  • Florian Raudies & Eric A Zilli & Michael E Hasselmo, 2014. "Deep Belief Networks Learn Context Dependent Behavior," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-9, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0093250
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093250
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0093250
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0093250&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0093250?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonathan D. Wallis & Kathleen C. Anderson & Earl K. Miller, 2001. "Single neurons in prefrontal cortex encode abstract rules," Nature, Nature, vol. 411(6840), pages 953-956, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ali Ghazizadeh & Okihide Hikosaka, 2022. "Salience memories formed by value, novelty and aversiveness jointly shape object responses in the prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Bahareh Taghizadeh & Ole Fortmann & Alexander Gail, 2024. "Position- and scale-invariant object-centered spatial localization in monkey frontoparietal cortex dynamically adapts to cognitive demand," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Daigo Takeuchi & Dheeraj Roy & Shruti Muralidhar & Takashi Kawai & Andrea Bari & Chanel Lovett & Heather A. Sullivan & Ian R. Wickersham & Susumu Tonegawa, 2022. "Cingulate-motor circuits update rule representations for sequential choice decisions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Márton Albert Hajnal & Duy Tran & Michael Einstein & Mauricio Vallejo Martelo & Karen Safaryan & Pierre-Olivier Polack & Peyman Golshani & Gergő Orbán, 2023. "Continuous multiplexed population representations of task context in the mouse primary visual cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Arno Onken & Jue Xie & Stefano Panzeri & Camillo Padoa-Schioppa, 2019. "Categorical encoding of decision variables in orbitofrontal cortex," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-27, October.
    6. R Becket Ebitz & Brianna J Sleezer & Hank P Jedema & Charles W Bradberry & Benjamin Y Hayden, 2019. "Tonic exploration governs both flexibility and lapses," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-37, November.
    7. Francesco Ceccarelli & Lorenzo Ferrucci & Fabrizio Londei & Surabhi Ramawat & Emiliano Brunamonti & Aldo Genovesio, 2023. "Static and dynamic coding in distinct cell types during associative learning in the prefrontal cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0093250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.