IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0088761.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Social Nestwork: Tree Structure Determines Nest Placement in Kenyan Weaverbird Colonies

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Angela Echeverry-Galvis
  • Jennifer K Peterson
  • Rajmonda Sulo-Caceres

Abstract

Group living is a life history strategy employed by many organisms. This strategy is often difficult to study because the exact boundaries of a group can be unclear. Weaverbirds present an ideal model for the study of group living, because their colonies occupy a space with discrete boundaries: a single tree. We examined one aspect of group living. nest placement, in three Kenyan weaverbird species: the Black-capped Weaver (Pseudonigrita cabanisi), Grey-capped Weaver (P. arnaudi) and White-browed Sparrow Weaver (Ploceropasser mahali). We asked which environmental, biological, and/or abiotic factors influenced their nest arrangement and location in a given tree. We used machine learning to analyze measurements taken from 16 trees and 516 nests outside the breeding season at the Mpala Research Station in Laikipia Kenya, along with climate data for the area. We found that tree architecture, number of nests per tree, and nest-specific characteristics were the main variables driving nest placement. Our results suggest that different Kenyan weaverbird species have similar priorities driving the selection of where a nest is placed within a given tree. Our work illustrates the advantage of using machine learning techniques to investigate biological questions.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Angela Echeverry-Galvis & Jennifer K Peterson & Rajmonda Sulo-Caceres, 2014. "The Social Nestwork: Tree Structure Determines Nest Placement in Kenyan Weaverbird Colonies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-7, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0088761
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088761
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0088761
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0088761&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0088761?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Goldstein Benjamin A & Polley Eric C & Briggs Farren B. S., 2011. "Random Forests for Genetic Association Studies," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-34, July.
    2. Guoyi Zhang & Yan Lu, 2012. "Bias-corrected random forests in regression," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 151-160, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Backer, David & Billing, Trey, 2024. "Forecasting the prevalence of child acute malnutrition using environmental and conflict conditions as leading indicators," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    2. Hyukjun Gweon & Shu Li & Yangxuan Xu, 2024. "Use of Prediction Bias in Active Learning and Its Application to Large Variable Annuity Portfolios," Risks, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-14, May.
    3. Ku, Arthur Lin & Qiu, Yueming (Lucy) & Lou, Jiehong & Nock, Destenie & Xing, Bo, 2022. "Changes in hourly electricity consumption under COVID mandates: A glance to future hourly residential power consumption pattern with remote work in Arizona," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    4. Feng, Puyu & Wang, Bin & Liu, De Li & Yu, Qiang, 2019. "Machine learning-based integration of remotely-sensed drought factors can improve the estimation of agricultural drought in South-Eastern Australia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 303-316.
    5. Wei, Pengfei & Lu, Zhenzhou & Song, Jingwen, 2015. "Variable importance analysis: A comprehensive review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 399-432.
    6. Xianguo Ren & Haiqing Tian & Kai Zhao & Dapeng Li & Ziqing Xiao & Yang Yu & Fei Liu, 2022. "Research on pH Value Detection Method during Maize Silage Secondary Fermentation Based on Computer Vision," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, October.
    7. Yizhou Wu & Zichun Huang & Dan Han & Xiaoli Qiu & Yaxin Pan, 2023. "Evolution of Urban Ecosystem Service Value and a Scenario Analysis Based on Land Utilization Changes: A Case Study of Hangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, May.
    8. Dinesh Reddy Vangumalli & Konstantinos Nikolopoulos & Konstantia Litsiou, 2019. "Clustering, Forecasting and Cluster Forecasting: using k-medoids, k-NNs and random forests for cluster selection," Working Papers 19016, Bangor Business School, Prifysgol Bangor University (Cymru / Wales).
    9. Wang, Jiacheng & Zhao, Zhihong & Liu, Guihong & Xu, Haoran, 2022. "A robust optimization approach of well placement for doublet in heterogeneous geothermal reservoirs using random forest technique and genetic algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).
    10. Silke Janitza & Roman Hornung, 2018. "On the overestimation of random forest’s out-of-bag error," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-31, August.
    11. Florian Marcel Nuţă & Alina Cristina Nuţă & Cristina Gabriela Zamfir & Stefan-Mihai Petrea & Dan Munteanu & Dragos Sebastian Cristea, 2021. "National Carbon Accounting—Analyzing the Impact of Urbanization and Energy-Related Factors upon CO 2 Emissions in Central–Eastern European Countries by Using Machine Learning Algorithms and Panel Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-23, May.
    12. Gert Bijnens & Shyngys Karimov & Jozef Konings, 2023. "Does Automatic Wage Indexation Destroy Jobs? A Machine Learning Approach," De Economist, Springer, vol. 171(1), pages 85-117, March.
    13. Michel Fuino & Andrey Ugarte Montero & Joël Wagner, 2022. "On the drivers of potential customers' interest in long‐term care insurance: Evidence from Switzerland," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 25(3), pages 271-302, September.
    14. Lauric A Ferrat & Marc Goodfellow & John R Terry, 2018. "Classifying dynamic transitions in high dimensional neural mass models: A random forest approach," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-27, March.
    15. Sim Aaron & Tsagkrasoulis Dimosthenis & Montana Giovanni, 2013. "Random forests on distance matrices for imaging genetics studies," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 12(6), pages 757-786, December.
    16. Cihan Şahin, 2023. "Predicting base station return on investment in the telecommunications industry: Machine‐learning approaches," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 29-40, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0088761. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.