IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0085434.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Competition Work as a Motivating Factor in E-Learning? A Randomized Controlled Trial

Author

Listed:
  • Bjarne Skjødt Worm
  • Steen Vigh Buch

Abstract

Background and Aims: Examinations today are often computerized and the primary motivation and curriculum is often based on the examinations. This study aims to test if competition widgets in e-learning quiz modules improve post-test and follow-up test results and self-evaluation. The secondary aim is to evaluate improvements during the training period comparing test-results and number of tests taken. Methods: Two groups were randomly assigned to either a quiz-module with competition widgets or a module without. Pre-, post- and follow up test-results were recorded. Time used within the modules was measured and students reported time studying. Students were able to choose questions from former examinations in the quiz-module. Results: Students from the competing group were significantly better at both post-and follow-up-test and had a significantly better overall learning efficiency than those from the non-competing group. They were also significantly better at guessing their post-test results. Conclusion: Quiz modules with competition widgets motivate students to become more active during the module and stimulate better total efficiency. They also generate improved self-awareness regarding post-test-results.

Suggested Citation

  • Bjarne Skjødt Worm & Steen Vigh Buch, 2014. "Does Competition Work as a Motivating Factor in E-Learning? A Randomized Controlled Trial," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-6, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0085434
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085434
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0085434
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0085434&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0085434?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bjarne Skjødt Worm, 2013. "Learning from Simple Ebooks, Online Cases or Classroom Teaching When Acquiring Complex Knowledge. A Randomized Controlled Trial in Respiratory Physiology and Pulmonology," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-5, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Juan J. López-Jiménez & José L. Fernández-Alemán & José A. García-Berná & Laura López González & Ofelia González Sequeros & Joaquín Nicolás Ros & Juan M. Carrillo de Gea & Ali Idri & Ambrosio Toval, 2021. "Effects of Gamification on the Benefits of Student Response Systems in Learning of Human Anatomy: Three Experimental Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Angela Medina & Jesus C. Hernández & Emilio Muñoz-Cerón & Catalina Rus-Casas, 2020. "Identification of Educational Models That Encourage Business Participation in Higher Education Institutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-23, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0085434. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.