IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0078364.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Factors Associated with Default from Multi- and Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Treatment, Uzbekistan: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Maeve K Lalor
  • Jane Greig
  • Sholpan Allamuratova
  • Sandy Althomsons
  • Zinaida Tigay
  • Atadjan Khaemraev
  • Kai Braker
  • Oleksander Telnov
  • Philipp du Cros

Abstract

Background: The Médecins Sans Frontières project of Uzbekistan has provided multidrug-resistant tuberculosis treatment in the Karakalpakstan region since 2003. Rates of default from treatment have been high, despite psychosocial support, increasing particularly since programme scale-up in 2007. We aimed to determine factors associated with default in multi- and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis patients who started treatment between 2003 and 2008 and thus had finished approximately 2 years of treatment by the end of 2010. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis of multi- and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis patients enrolled in treatment between 2003 and 2008 compared baseline demographic characteristics and possible risk factors for default. Default was defined as missing ≥60 consecutive days of treatment (all drugs). Data were routinely collected during treatment and entered in a database. Potential risk factors for default were assessed in univariate analysis using chi-square test and in multivariate analysis with logistic regression. Results: 20% (142/710) of patients defaulted after a median of 6 months treatment (IQR 2.6–9.9). Factors associated with default included severity of resistance patterns (pre-extensively drug-resistant/extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis adjusted odds ratio 0.52, 95%CI: 0.31–0.86), previous default (2.38, 1.09–5.24) and age >45 years (1.77, 1.10–2.87). The default rate was 14% (42/294) for patients enrolled 2003–2006 and 24% (100/416) for 2007–2008 enrolments (p = 0.001). Conclusions: Default from treatment was high and increased with programme scale-up. It is essential to ensure scale-up of treatment is accompanied with scale-up of staff and patient support. A successful first course of tuberculosis treatment is important; patients who had previously defaulted were at increased risk of default and death. The protective effect of severe resistance profiles suggests that understanding disease severity or fear may motivate against default. Targeted health education and support for at-risk patients after 5 months of treatment when many begin to feel better may decrease default.

Suggested Citation

  • Maeve K Lalor & Jane Greig & Sholpan Allamuratova & Sandy Althomsons & Zinaida Tigay & Atadjan Khaemraev & Kai Braker & Oleksander Telnov & Philipp du Cros, 2013. "Risk Factors Associated with Default from Multi- and Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Treatment, Uzbekistan: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(11), pages 1-5, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0078364
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078364
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0078364
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0078364&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0078364?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shama D Ahuja & David Ashkin & Monika Avendano & Rita Banerjee & Melissa Bauer & Jamie N Bayona & Mercedes C Becerra & Andrea Benedetti & Marcos Burgos & Rosella Centis & Eward D Chan & Chen-Yuan Chia, 2012. "Multidrug Resistant Pulmonary Tuberculosis Treatment Regimens and Patient Outcomes: An Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis of 9,153 Patients," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-16, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Khasan Safaev & Nargiza Parpieva & Irina Liverko & Sharofiddin Yuldashev & Kostyantyn Dumchev & Jamshid Gadoev & Oleksandr Korotych & Anthony D. Harries, 2021. "Trends, Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes of Patients with Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Uzbekistan: 2013–2018," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Sizulu Moyo & Helen S Cox & Jennifer Hughes & Johnny Daniels & Leigh Synman & Virginia De Azevedo & Amir Shroufi & Vivian Cox & Gilles van Cutsem, 2015. "Loss from Treatment for Drug Resistant Tuberculosis: Risk Factors and Patient Outcomes in a Community-Based Program in Khayelitsha, South Africa," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-13, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tom Decroo & Aung Kya Jai Maug & Mohamed Anwar Hossain & Cécile Uwizeye & Mourad Gumusboga & Tine Demeulenaere & Nimer Ortuño-Gutiérrez & Bouke C de Jong & Armand Van Deun, 2020. "Injectables’ key role in rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis shorter treatment regimen outcomes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-11, August.
    2. Kalpita S Shringarpure & Petros Isaakidis & Karuna D Sagili & R K Baxi, 2015. "Loss-To-Follow-Up on Multidrug Resistant Tuberculosis Treatment in Gujarat, India: The WHEN and WHO of It," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-10, July.
    3. Guanbo Wang & Mireille E. Schnitzer & Dick Menzies & Piret Viiklepp & Timothy H. Holtz & Andrea Benedetti, 2020. "Estimating treatment importance in multidrug‐resistant tuberculosis using Targeted Learning: An observational individual patient data network meta‐analysis," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(3), pages 1007-1016, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0078364. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.