Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Validation Studies on a Diabetes Case Definition from Health Administrative Records
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075256
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Ana Lopez-de-Andres & Rodrigo Jimenez-Garcia & Jose J. Zamorano-Leon & Ricardo Omaña-Palanco & David Carabantes-Alarcon & Valentin Hernández-Barrera & Javier De Miguel-Diez & Natividad Cuadrado-Corral, 2023. "Prevalence of Dementia among Patients Hospitalized with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Spain, 2011–2020: Sex-Related Disparities and Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-14, March.
- Aruna Jha & Manik Ahuja & Rajvi J. Wani, 2022. "Suicide Among South Asians in the United States: A Growing Public Health Problem," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, December.
- Ana Lopez-de-Andres & Rodrigo Jimenez-Garcia & Valentin Hernandez-Barrera & Isabel Jimenez-Trujillo & Carmen Gallardo-Pino & Angel Gil de Miguel & Pilar Carrasco-Garrido, 2014. "National Trends over One Decade in Hospitalization for Acute Myocardial Infarction among Spanish Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: Cumulative Incidence, Outcomes and Use of Percutaneous Coronary Interventi," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-7, January.
- Sonsoles Fuentes & Emmanuel Cosson & Laurence Mandereau-Bruno & Anne Fagot-Campagna & Pascale Bernillon & Marcel Goldberg & Sandrine Fosse-Edorh, 2019. "Identifying diabetes cases in health administrative databases: a validation study based on a large French cohort," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 64(3), pages 441-450, April.
More about this item
Keywords
“diabetes mellitus”; “administrative databases”; “validation studies”). reviewers abstracted data with standardized forms and assessed quality using quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (quadas) criteria. a generalized linear model approach to random-effects bivariate regression meta-analysis was used to pool sensitivity and specificity estimates. we applied correction factors derived from pooled sensitivity and specificity estimates to prevalence estimates from national surveillance reports and projected prevalence estimates over 10 years (to 2018). results: the search strategy identified 1423 abstracts among which 11 studies were deemed relevant and reviewed; 6 of these reported sensitivity and specificity allowing pooling in a meta-analysis. compared to surveys or medical records; sensitivity was 82.3% (95%ci 75.8; 87.4) and specificity was 97.9% (95%ci 96.5; 98.8). the diabetes case definition underestimated prevalence when it was ≤10.6% and overestimated prevalence otherwise. conclusion: the diabetes case definition examined misses up to one fifth of diabetes cases and wrongly identifies diabetes in approximately 2% of the population. this may be sufficiently sensitive and specific for surveillance purposes; in particular monitoring prevalence trends. applying correction factors to adjust prevalence estimates from this definition may be helpful to increase accuracy of estimates.;All these keywords.
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0075256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.