IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0075256.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Validation Studies on a Diabetes Case Definition from Health Administrative Records

Author

Listed:
  • Aaron Leong
  • Kaberi Dasgupta
  • Sasha Bernatsky
  • Diane Lacaille
  • Antonio Avina-Zubieta
  • Elham Rahme

Abstract

Objectives: Health administrative data are frequently used for diabetes surveillance. We aimed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of a commonly-used diabetes case definition (two physician claims or one hospital discharge abstract record within a two-year period) and their potential effect on prevalence estimation. Methods: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched Medline (from 1950) and Embase (from 1980) databases for validation studies through August 2012 (keywords: “diabetes mellitus”; “administrative databases”; “validation studies”). Reviewers abstracted data with standardized forms and assessed quality using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) criteria. A generalized linear model approach to random-effects bivariate regression meta-analysis was used to pool sensitivity and specificity estimates. We applied correction factors derived from pooled sensitivity and specificity estimates to prevalence estimates from national surveillance reports and projected prevalence estimates over 10 years (to 2018). Results: The search strategy identified 1423 abstracts among which 11 studies were deemed relevant and reviewed; 6 of these reported sensitivity and specificity allowing pooling in a meta-analysis. Compared to surveys or medical records, sensitivity was 82.3% (95%CI 75.8, 87.4) and specificity was 97.9% (95%CI 96.5, 98.8). The diabetes case definition underestimated prevalence when it was ≤10.6% and overestimated prevalence otherwise. Conclusion: The diabetes case definition examined misses up to one fifth of diabetes cases and wrongly identifies diabetes in approximately 2% of the population. This may be sufficiently sensitive and specific for surveillance purposes, in particular monitoring prevalence trends. Applying correction factors to adjust prevalence estimates from this definition may be helpful to increase accuracy of estimates.

Suggested Citation

  • Aaron Leong & Kaberi Dasgupta & Sasha Bernatsky & Diane Lacaille & Antonio Avina-Zubieta & Elham Rahme, 2013. "Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Validation Studies on a Diabetes Case Definition from Health Administrative Records," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(10), pages 1-11, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0075256
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0075256
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0075256&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0075256?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ana Lopez-de-Andres & Rodrigo Jimenez-Garcia & Jose J. Zamorano-Leon & Ricardo Omaña-Palanco & David Carabantes-Alarcon & Valentin Hernández-Barrera & Javier De Miguel-Diez & Natividad Cuadrado-Corral, 2023. "Prevalence of Dementia among Patients Hospitalized with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Spain, 2011–2020: Sex-Related Disparities and Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Aruna Jha & Manik Ahuja & Rajvi J. Wani, 2022. "Suicide Among South Asians in the United States: A Growing Public Health Problem," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, December.
    3. Ana Lopez-de-Andres & Rodrigo Jimenez-Garcia & Valentin Hernandez-Barrera & Isabel Jimenez-Trujillo & Carmen Gallardo-Pino & Angel Gil de Miguel & Pilar Carrasco-Garrido, 2014. "National Trends over One Decade in Hospitalization for Acute Myocardial Infarction among Spanish Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: Cumulative Incidence, Outcomes and Use of Percutaneous Coronary Interventi," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-7, January.
    4. Sonsoles Fuentes & Emmanuel Cosson & Laurence Mandereau-Bruno & Anne Fagot-Campagna & Pascale Bernillon & Marcel Goldberg & Sandrine Fosse-Edorh, 2019. "Identifying diabetes cases in health administrative databases: a validation study based on a large French cohort," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 64(3), pages 441-450, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    “diabetes mellitus”; “administrative databases”; “validation studies”). reviewers abstracted data with standardized forms and assessed quality using quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (quadas) criteria. a generalized linear model approach to random-effects bivariate regression meta-analysis was used to pool sensitivity and specificity estimates. we applied correction factors derived from pooled sensitivity and specificity estimates to prevalence estimates from national surveillance reports and projected prevalence estimates over 10 years (to 2018). results: the search strategy identified 1423 abstracts among which 11 studies were deemed relevant and reviewed; 6 of these reported sensitivity and specificity allowing pooling in a meta-analysis. compared to surveys or medical records; sensitivity was 82.3% (95%ci 75.8; 87.4) and specificity was 97.9% (95%ci 96.5; 98.8). the diabetes case definition underestimated prevalence when it was ≤10.6% and overestimated prevalence otherwise. conclusion: the diabetes case definition examined misses up to one fifth of diabetes cases and wrongly identifies diabetes in approximately 2% of the population. this may be sufficiently sensitive and specific for surveillance purposes; in particular monitoring prevalence trends. applying correction factors to adjust prevalence estimates from this definition may be helpful to increase accuracy of estimates.;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0075256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.