IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0070490.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Concentration Addition, Independent Action and Generalized Concentration Addition Models for Mixture Effect Prediction of Sex Hormone Synthesis In Vitro

Author

Listed:
  • Niels Hadrup
  • Camilla Taxvig
  • Mikael Pedersen
  • Christine Nellemann
  • Ulla Hass
  • Anne Marie Vinggaard

Abstract

Humans are concomitantly exposed to numerous chemicals. An infinite number of combinations and doses thereof can be imagined. For toxicological risk assessment the mathematical prediction of mixture effects, using knowledge on single chemicals, is therefore desirable. We investigated pros and cons of the concentration addition (CA), independent action (IA) and generalized concentration addition (GCA) models. First we measured effects of single chemicals and mixtures thereof on steroid synthesis in H295R cells. Then single chemical data were applied to the models; predictions of mixture effects were calculated and compared to the experimental mixture data. Mixture 1 contained environmental chemicals adjusted in ratio according to human exposure levels. Mixture 2 was a potency adjusted mixture containing five pesticides. Prediction of testosterone effects coincided with the experimental Mixture 1 data. In contrast, antagonism was observed for effects of Mixture 2 on this hormone. The mixtures contained chemicals exerting only limited maximal effects. This hampered prediction by the CA and IA models, whereas the GCA model could be used to predict a full dose response curve. Regarding effects on progesterone and estradiol, some chemicals were having stimulatory effects whereas others had inhibitory effects. The three models were not applicable in this situation and no predictions could be performed. Finally, the expected contributions of single chemicals to the mixture effects were calculated. Prochloraz was the predominant but not sole driver of the mixtures, suggesting that one chemical alone was not responsible for the mixture effects. In conclusion, the GCA model seemed to be superior to the CA and IA models for the prediction of testosterone effects. A situation with chemicals exerting opposing effects, for which the models could not be applied, was identified. In addition, the data indicate that in non-potency adjusted mixtures the effects cannot always be accounted for by single chemicals.

Suggested Citation

  • Niels Hadrup & Camilla Taxvig & Mikael Pedersen & Christine Nellemann & Ulla Hass & Anne Marie Vinggaard, 2013. "Concentration Addition, Independent Action and Generalized Concentration Addition Models for Mixture Effect Prediction of Sex Hormone Synthesis In Vitro," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-13, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0070490
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070490
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0070490
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0070490&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0070490?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Svenja Rieke & Sophie Koehn & Karen Hirsch-Ernst & Rudolf Pfeil & Carsten Kneuer & Philip Marx-Stoelting, 2014. "Combination Effects of (Tri)Azole Fungicides on Hormone Production and Xenobiotic Metabolism in a Human Placental Cell Line," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Paulina Vilela & Gabriel Jácome & Wladimir Moya & Pouya Ifaei & Sungku Heo & Changkyoo Yoo, 2023. "A Brief Insight into the Toxicity Conundrum: Modeling, Measuring, Monitoring and Evaluating Ecotoxicity for Water Quality towards Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-28, May.
    3. Eva Govarts & Sylvie Remy & Liesbeth Bruckers & Elly Den Hond & Isabelle Sioen & Vera Nelen & Willy Baeyens & Tim S Nawrot & Ilse Loots & Nick Van Larebeke & Greet Schoeters, 2016. "Combined Effects of Prenatal Exposures to Environmental Chemicals on Birth Weight," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0070490. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.