IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0069878.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Amino Acid Usage Is Asymmetrically Biased in AT- and GC-Rich Microbial Genomes

Author

Listed:
  • Jon Bohlin
  • Ola Brynildsrud
  • Tammi Vesth
  • Eystein Skjerve
  • David W Ussery

Abstract

Introduction: Genomic base composition ranges from less than 25% AT to more than 85% AT in prokaryotes. Since only a small fraction of prokaryotic genomes is not protein coding even a minor change in genomic base composition will induce profound protein changes. We examined how amino acid and codon frequencies were distributed in over 2000 microbial genomes and how these distributions were affected by base compositional changes. In addition, we wanted to know how genome-wide amino acid usage was biased in the different genomes and how changes to base composition and mutations affected this bias. To carry this out, we used a Generalized Additive Mixed-effects Model (GAMM) to explore non-linear associations and strong data dependences in closely related microbes; principal component analysis (PCA) was used to examine genomic amino acid- and codon frequencies, while the concept of relative entropy was used to analyze genomic mutation rates. Results: We found that genomic amino acid frequencies carried a stronger phylogenetic signal than codon frequencies, but that this signal was weak compared to that of genomic %AT. Further, in contrast to codon usage bias (CUB), amino acid usage bias (AAUB) was differently distributed in AT- and GC-rich genomes in the sense that AT-rich genomes did not prefer specific amino acids over others to the same extent as GC-rich genomes. AAUB was also associated with relative entropy; genomes with low AAUB contained more random mutations as a consequence of relaxed purifying selection than genomes with higher AAUB. Conclusion: Genomic base composition has a substantial effect on both amino acid- and codon frequencies in bacterial genomes. While phylogeny influenced amino acid usage more in GC-rich genomes, AT-content was driving amino acid usage in AT-rich genomes. We found the GAMM model to be an excellent tool to analyze the genomic data used in this study.

Suggested Citation

  • Jon Bohlin & Ola Brynildsrud & Tammi Vesth & Eystein Skjerve & David W Ussery, 2013. "Amino Acid Usage Is Asymmetrically Biased in AT- and GC-Rich Microbial Genomes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-10, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0069878
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069878
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0069878
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0069878&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0069878?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jon Bohlin & Eystein Skjerve & David W Ussery, 2008. "Investigations of Oligonucleotide Usage Variance Within and Between Prokaryotes," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(4), pages 1-9, April.
    2. Jon Bohlin & Eystein Skjerve, 2009. "Examination of Genome Homogeneity in Prokaryotes Using Genomic Signatures," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(12), pages 1-12, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sophia S Liu & Adam J Hockenberry & Andrea Lancichinetti & Michael C Jewett & Luís A N Amaral, 2016. "NullSeq: A Tool for Generating Random Coding Sequences with Desired Amino Acid and GC Contents," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-12, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Colin F Davenport & Burkhard Tümmler, 2010. "Abundant Oligonucleotides Common to Most Bacteria," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(3), pages 1-8, March.
    2. Suvorova Yulia M. & Korotkov Eugene V., 2015. "Study of triplet periodicity differences inside and between genomes," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 14(2), pages 113-123, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0069878. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.