IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0008113.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examination of Genome Homogeneity in Prokaryotes Using Genomic Signatures

Author

Listed:
  • Jon Bohlin
  • Eystein Skjerve

Abstract

Background: DNA word frequencies, normalized for genomic AT content, are remarkably stable within prokaryotic genomes and are therefore said to reflect a “genomic signature.” The genomic signatures can be used to phylogenetically classify organisms from arbitrary sampled DNA. Genomic signatures can also be used to search for horizontally transferred DNA or DNA regions subjected to special selection forces. Thus, the stability of the genomic signature can be used as a measure of genomic homogeneity. The factors associated with the stability of the genomic signatures are not known, and this motivated us to investigate further. We analyzed the intra-genomic variance of genomic signatures based on AT content normalization (0th order Markov model) as well as genomic signatures normalized by smaller DNA words (1st and 2nd order Markov models) for 636 sequenced prokaryotic genomes. Regression models were fitted, with intra-genomic signature variance as the response variable, to a set of factors representing genomic properties such as genomic AT content, genome size, habitat, phylum, oxygen requirement, optimal growth temperature and oligonucleotide usage variance (OUV, a measure of oligonucleotide usage bias), measured as the variance between genomic tetranucleotide frequencies and Markov chain approximated tetranucleotide frequencies, as predictors. Principal Findings: Regression analysis revealed that OUV was the most important factor (p

Suggested Citation

  • Jon Bohlin & Eystein Skjerve, 2009. "Examination of Genome Homogeneity in Prokaryotes Using Genomic Signatures," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(12), pages 1-12, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0008113
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0008113
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0008113&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0008113?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jon Bohlin & Ola Brynildsrud & Tammi Vesth & Eystein Skjerve & David W Ussery, 2013. "Amino Acid Usage Is Asymmetrically Biased in AT- and GC-Rich Microbial Genomes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-10, July.
    2. Suvorova Yulia M. & Korotkov Eugene V., 2015. "Study of triplet periodicity differences inside and between genomes," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 14(2), pages 113-123, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0008113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.