IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0067019.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ANOVA-Like Differential Expression (ALDEx) Analysis for Mixed Population RNA-Seq

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew D Fernandes
  • Jean M Macklaim
  • Thomas G Linn
  • Gregor Reid
  • Gregory B Gloor

Abstract

Experimental variance is a major challenge when dealing with high-throughput sequencing data. This variance has several sources: sampling replication, technical replication, variability within biological conditions, and variability between biological conditions. The high per-sample cost of RNA-Seq often precludes the large number of experiments needed to partition observed variance into these categories as per standard ANOVA models. We show that the partitioning of within-condition to between-condition variation cannot reasonably be ignored, whether in single-organism RNA-Seq or in Meta-RNA-Seq experiments, and further find that commonly-used RNA-Seq analysis tools, as described in the literature, do not enforce the constraint that the sum of relative expression levels must be one, and thus report expression levels that are systematically distorted. These two factors lead to misleading inferences if not properly accommodated. As it is usually only the biological between-condition and within-condition differences that are of interest, we developed ALDEx, an ANOVA-like differential expression procedure, to identify genes with greater between- to within-condition differences. We show that the presence of differential expression and the magnitude of these comparative differences can be reasonably estimated with even very small sample sizes.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew D Fernandes & Jean M Macklaim & Thomas G Linn & Gregor Reid & Gregory B Gloor, 2013. "ANOVA-Like Differential Expression (ALDEx) Analysis for Mixed Population RNA-Seq," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-15, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0067019
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0067019
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0067019&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0067019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bin Zhu & David J. Edwards & Katherine M. Spaine & Laahirie Edupuganti & Andrey Matveyev & Myrna G. Serrano & Gregory A. Buck, 2024. "The association of maternal factors with the neonatal microbiota and health," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Sarah J Vancuren & Scott J Dos Santos & Janet E Hill & the Maternal Microbiome Legacy Project Team, 2020. "Evaluation of variant calling for cpn60 barcode sequence-based microbiome profiling," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-14, July.
    3. Dalton T. Ham & Tyler S. Browne & Pooja N. Banglorewala & Tyler L. Wilson & Richard K. Michael & Gregory B. Gloor & David R. Edgell, 2023. "A generalizable Cas9/sgRNA prediction model using machine transfer learning with small high-quality datasets," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Tu, Wangshu & Browne, Ryan & Subedi, Sanjeena, 2024. "A mixture of logistic skew-normal multinomial models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0067019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.