IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0063090.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improvements to Robotics-Inspired Conformational Sampling in Rosetta

Author

Listed:
  • Amelie Stein
  • Tanja Kortemme

Abstract

To accurately predict protein conformations in atomic detail, a computational method must be capable of sampling models sufficiently close to the native structure. All-atom sampling is difficult because of the vast number of possible conformations and extremely rugged energy landscapes. Here, we test three sampling strategies to address these difficulties: conformational diversification, intensification of torsion and omega-angle sampling and parameter annealing. We evaluate these strategies in the context of the robotics-based kinematic closure (KIC) method for local conformational sampling in Rosetta on an established benchmark set of 45 12-residue protein segments without regular secondary structure. We quantify performance as the fraction of sub-Angstrom models generated. While improvements with individual strategies are only modest, the combination of intensification and annealing strategies into a new “next-generation KIC” method yields a four-fold increase over standard KIC in the median percentage of sub-Angstrom models across the dataset. Such improvements enable progress on more difficult problems, as demonstrated on longer segments, several of which could not be accurately remodeled with previous methods. Given its improved sampling capability, next-generation KIC should allow advances in other applications such as local conformational remodeling of multiple segments simultaneously, flexible backbone sequence design, and development of more accurate energy functions.

Suggested Citation

  • Amelie Stein & Tanja Kortemme, 2013. "Improvements to Robotics-Inspired Conformational Sampling in Rosetta," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(5), pages 1-13, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0063090
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063090
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0063090
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0063090&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0063090?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bin Qian & Srivatsan Raman & Rhiju Das & Philip Bradley & Airlie J. McCoy & Randy J. Read & David Baker, 2007. "High-resolution structure prediction and the crystallographic phase problem," Nature, Nature, vol. 450(7167), pages 259-264, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sneha Vishwanath & Alexandre G de Brevern & Narayanaswamy Srinivasan, 2018. "Same but not alike: Structure, flexibility and energetics of domains in multi-domain proteins are influenced by the presence of other domains," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-26, February.
    2. Barak Raveh & Angela Enosh & Ora Schueler-Furman & Dan Halperin, 2009. "Rapid Sampling of Molecular Motions with Prior Information Constraints," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(2), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Brian A Kidd & David Baker & Wendy E Thomas, 2009. "Computation of Conformational Coupling in Allosteric Proteins," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(8), pages 1-10, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0063090. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.