IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0057072.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Local Competition and Metapopulation Processes Drive Long-Term Seagrass-Epiphyte Population Dynamics

Author

Listed:
  • Delphine Lobelle
  • Emma J Kenyon
  • Kevan J Cook
  • James C Bull

Abstract

It is well known that ecological processes such as population regulation and natural enemy interactions potentially occur over a range of spatial scales, and there is a substantial body of literature developing theoretical understanding of the interplay between these processes. However, there are comparatively few studies quantifying the long-term effects of spatial scaling in natural ecosystems. A key challenge is that trophic complexity in real-world biological communities quickly obscures the signal from a focal process. Seagrass meadows provide an excellent opportunity in this respect: in many instances, seagrasses effectively form extensive natural monocultures, in which hypotheses about endogenous dynamics can be formulated and tested. We present amongst the longest unbroken, spatially explict time series of seagrass abundance published to date. Data include annual measures of shoot density, total above-ground abundance, and associated epiphyte cover from five Zostera marina meadows distributed around the Isles of Scilly, UK, from 1996 to 2011. We explore empirical patterns at the local and metapopulation scale using standard time series analysis and develop a simple population dynamic model, testing the hypothesis that both local and metapopulation scale feedback processes are important. We find little evidence of an interaction between scales in seagrass dynamics but that both scales contribute approximately equally to observed local epiphyte abundance. By quantifying the long-term dynamics of seagrass-epiphyte interactions we show how measures of density and extent are both important in establishing baseline information relevant to predicting responses to environmental change and developing management plans. We hope that this study complements existing mechanistic studies of physiology, genetics and productivity in seagrass, whilst highlighting the potential of seagrass as a model ecosystem. More generally, this study provides a rare opportunity to test some of the predictions of ecological theory in a natural ecosystem of global conservation and economic value.

Suggested Citation

  • Delphine Lobelle & Emma J Kenyon & Kevan J Cook & James C Bull, 2013. "Local Competition and Metapopulation Processes Drive Long-Term Seagrass-Epiphyte Population Dynamics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-10, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0057072
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057072
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0057072
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0057072&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0057072?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peck, Steven L., 2012. "Networks of habitat patches in tsetse fly control: Implications of metapopulation structure on assessing local extinction probabilities," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 246(C), pages 99-102.
    2. Mads S Thomsen & Thomas Wernberg & Aschwin H Engelen & Fernando Tuya & Mat A Vanderklift & Marianne Holmer & Karen J McGlathery & Francisco Arenas & Jonne Kotta & Brian R Silliman, 2012. "A Meta-Analysis of Seaweed Impacts on Seagrasses: Generalities and Knowledge Gaps," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(1), pages 1-8, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0057072. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.