IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0028595.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Meta-Analysis of Seaweed Impacts on Seagrasses: Generalities and Knowledge Gaps

Author

Listed:
  • Mads S Thomsen
  • Thomas Wernberg
  • Aschwin H Engelen
  • Fernando Tuya
  • Mat A Vanderklift
  • Marianne Holmer
  • Karen J McGlathery
  • Francisco Arenas
  • Jonne Kotta
  • Brian R Silliman

Abstract

Seagrasses are important habitat-formers and ecosystem engineers that are under threat from bloom-forming seaweeds. These seaweeds have been suggested to outcompete the seagrasses, particularly when facilitated by eutrophication, causing regime shifts where green meadows and clear waters are replaced with unstable sediments, turbid waters, hypoxia, and poor habitat conditions for fishes and invertebrates. Understanding the situations under which seaweeds impact seagrasses on local patch scales can help proactive management and prevent losses at greater scales. Here, we provide a quantitative review of available published manipulative experiments (all conducted at the patch-scale), to test which attributes of seaweeds and seagrasses (e.g., their abundances, sizes, morphology, taxonomy, attachment type, or origin) influence impacts. Weighted and unweighted meta-analyses (Hedges d metric) of 59 experiments showed generally high variability in attribute-impact relationships. Our main significant findings were that (a) abundant seaweeds had stronger negative impacts on seagrasses than sparse seaweeds, (b) unattached and epiphytic seaweeds had stronger impacts than ‘rooted’ seaweeds, and (c) small seagrass species were more susceptible than larger species. Findings (a) and (c) were rather intuitive. It was more surprising that ‘rooted’ seaweeds had comparatively small impacts, particularly given that this category included the infamous invasive Caulerpa species. This result may reflect that seaweed biomass and/or shading and metabolic by-products like anoxia and sulphides could be lower for rooted seaweeds. In conclusion, our results represent simple and robust first-order generalities about seaweed impacts on seagrasses. This review also documented a limited number of primary studies. We therefore identified major knowledge gaps that need to be addressed before general predictive models on seaweed-seagrass interactions can be build, in order to effectively protect seagrass habitats from detrimental competition from seaweeds.

Suggested Citation

  • Mads S Thomsen & Thomas Wernberg & Aschwin H Engelen & Fernando Tuya & Mat A Vanderklift & Marianne Holmer & Karen J McGlathery & Francisco Arenas & Jonne Kotta & Brian R Silliman, 2012. "A Meta-Analysis of Seaweed Impacts on Seagrasses: Generalities and Knowledge Gaps," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(1), pages 1-8, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0028595
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028595
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0028595
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0028595&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0028595?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Delphine Lobelle & Emma J Kenyon & Kevan J Cook & James C Bull, 2013. "Local Competition and Metapopulation Processes Drive Long-Term Seagrass-Epiphyte Population Dynamics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-10, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0028595. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.