IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0048758.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Readmissions and Death after ICU Discharge: Development and Validation of Two Predictive Models

Author

Listed:
  • Omar Badawi
  • Michael J Breslow

Abstract

Introduction: Early discharge from the ICU is desirable because it shortens time in the ICU and reduces care costs, but can also increase the likelihood of ICU readmission and post-discharge unanticipated death if patients are discharged before they are stable. We postulated that, using eICU® Research Institute (eRI) data from >400 ICUs, we could develop robust models predictive of post-discharge death and readmission that may be incorporated into future clinical information systems (CIS) to assist ICU discharge planning. Methods: Retrospective, multi-center, exploratory cohort study of ICU survivors within the eRI database between 1/1/2007 and 3/31/2011. Exclusion criteria: DNR or care limitations at ICU discharge and discharge to location external to hospital. Patients were randomized (2∶1) to development and validation cohorts. Multivariable logistic regression was performed on a broad range of variables including: patient demographics, ICU admission diagnosis, admission severity of illness, laboratory values and physiologic variables present during the last 24 hours of the ICU stay. Multiple imputation was used to address missing data. The primary outcomes were the area under the receiver operator characteristic curves (auROC) in the validation cohorts for the models predicting readmission and death within 48 hours of ICU discharge. Results: 469,976 and 234,987 patients representing 219 hospitals were in the development and validation cohorts. Early ICU readmission and death was experienced by 2.54% and 0.92% of all patients, respectively. The relationship between predictors and outcomes (death vs readmission) differed, justifying the need for separate models. The models for early readmission and death produced auROCs of 0.71 and 0.92, respectively. Both models calibrated well across risk groups. Conclusions: Our models for death and readmission after ICU discharge showed good to excellent discrimination and good calibration. Although prospective validation is warranted, we speculate that these models may have value in assisting clinicians with ICU discharge planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Omar Badawi & Michael J Breslow, 2012. "Readmissions and Death after ICU Discharge: Development and Validation of Two Predictive Models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-15, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0048758
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048758
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0048758
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0048758&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0048758?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. José A. González-Nóvoa & Silvia Campanioni & Laura Busto & José Fariña & Juan J. Rodríguez-Andina & Dolores Vila & Andrés Íñiguez & César Veiga, 2023. "Improving Intensive Care Unit Early Readmission Prediction Using Optimized and Explainable Machine Learning," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Álvaro Riascos & Natalia Serna & Marcela Granados & Fernando Rosso & Ramiro Guerrero, 2016. "Predicting readmissions, mortality, and infections in the ICU using Machine Learning Techniques," Documentos de Trabajo 15074, Quantil.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0048758. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.