IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0048354.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Association between Extremely Low-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields Occupations and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Hongjie Zhou
  • Guangdi Chen
  • Chunjing Chen
  • Yunxian Yu
  • Zhengping Xu

Abstract

Objectives: To estimate the relationship between exposure to extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF-EMF) and the risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) by a meta-analysis. Methods: Through searching PubMed databases (or manual searching) up to April 2012 using the following keywords: “occupational exposure”, “electromagnetic fields” and “amyotrophic lateral sclerosis” or “motor neuron disease”, seventeen studies were identified as eligible for this meta-analysis. The associations between ELF-EMF exposure and the ALS risk were estimated based on study design (case-control or cohort study), and ELF-EMF exposure level assessment (job title or job-exposure matrix). The heterogeneity across the studies was tested, as was publication bias. Results: Occupational exposure to ELF-EMF was significantly associated with increased risk of ALS in pooled studies (RR = 1.29, 95%CI = 1.02–1.62), and case-control studies (OR = 1.39, 95%CI = 1.05–1.84), but not cohort studies (RR = 1.16, 95% CI = 0.80–1.69). In sub-analyses, similar significant associations were found when the exposure level was defined by the job title, but not the job-exposure matrix. In addition, significant associations between occupational exposure to ELF-EMF and increased risk of ALS were found in studies of subjects who were clinically diagnosed but not those based on the death certificate. Moderate heterogeneity was observed in all analyses. Conclusions: Our data suggest a slight but significant ALS risk increase among those with job titles related to relatively high levels of ELF-EMF exposure. Since the magnitude of estimated RR was relatively small, we cannot deny the possibility of potential biases at work. Electrical shocks or other unidentified variables associated with electrical occupations, rather than magnetic-field exposure, may be responsible for the observed associations with ALS.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongjie Zhou & Guangdi Chen & Chunjing Chen & Yunxian Yu & Zhengping Xu, 2012. "Association between Extremely Low-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields Occupations and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-7, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0048354
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048354
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0048354
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0048354&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0048354?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lars-Gunnar Gunnarsson & Lennart Bodin, 2019. "Occupational Exposures and Neurodegenerative Diseases—A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analyses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Joanna Wyszkowska & Colin Pritchard, 2022. "Open Questions on the Electromagnetic Field Contribution to the Risk of Neurodegenerative Diseases," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Lars-Gunnar Gunnarsson & Lennart Bodin, 2018. "Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Occupational Exposures: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analyses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-21, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    “occupational exposure”; “electromagnetic fields” and “amyotrophic lateral sclerosis” or “motor neuron disease”; seventeen studies were identified as eligible for this meta-analysis. the associations between elf-emf exposure and the als risk were estimated based on study design (case-control or cohort study); and elf-emf exposure level assessment (job title or job-exposure matrix). the heterogeneity across the studies was tested; as was publication bias. results: occupational exposure to elf-emf was significantly associated with increased risk of als in pooled studies (rr = 1.29; 95%ci = 1.02–1.62); and case-control studies (or = 1.39; 95%ci = 1.05–1.84); but not cohort studies (rr = 1.16; 95% ci = 0.80–1.69). in sub-analyses; similar significant associations were found when the exposure level was defined by the job title; but not the job-exposure matrix. in addition; significant associations between occupational exposure to elf-emf and increased risk of als were found in studies of subjects who were clinically diagnosed but not those based on the death certificate. moderate heterogeneity was observed in all analyses. conclusions: our data suggest a slight but significant als risk increase among those with job titles related to relatively high levels of elf-emf exposure. since the magnitude of estimated rr was relatively small; we cannot deny the possibility of potential biases at work. electrical shocks or other unidentified variables associated with electrical occupations; rather than magnetic-field exposure; may be responsible for the observed associations with als.;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0048354. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.