Justice Blocks and Predictability of U.S. Supreme Court Votes
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027188
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Porter, Mason A. & Mucha, Peter J. & Newman, M.E.J. & Friend, A.J., 2007. "Community structure in the United States House of Representatives," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 386(1), pages 414-438.
- Segal, Jeffrey A. & Cover, Albert D., 1989. "Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 83(2), pages 557-565, June.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Gael Poux-Medard & Sergio Cobo-Lopez & Jordi Duch & Roger Guimera & Marta Sales-Pardo, 2021. "Complex decision-making strategies in a stock market experiment explained as the combination of few simple strategies," Papers 2103.06121, arXiv.org.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Xiaohong Yu & Zhaoyang Sun, 2022. "The company they keep: When and why Chinese judges engage in collegiality," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), pages 936-1002, December.
- Keren Weinshall‐Margel, 2011. "Attitudinal and Neo‐Institutional Models of Supreme Court Decision Making: An Empirical and Comparative Perspective from Israel," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(3), pages 556-586, September.
- Álvaro Bustos & Tonja Jacobi, 2014.
"Strategic Judicial Preference Revelation,"
Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 57(1), pages 113-137.
- Álvaro Bustos & Tonja Jacobi, 2010. "Strategic Judicial Preference Revelation," Documentos de Trabajo 380, Instituto de Economia. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile..
- Clark, Tom S. & Montagnes, B. Pablo & Spenkuch, Jörg L., 2022.
"Politics from the Bench? Ideology and Strategic Voting in the U.S. Supreme Court,"
Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
- Tom S. Clark & B. Pablo Montagnes & Jörg L. Spenkuch, 2018. "Politics from the Bench? Ideology and Strategic Voting in the U.S. Supreme Court," CESifo Working Paper Series 7264, CESifo.
- Bernardo Guimaraes & Bruno Meyerhof Salama, 2023.
"Permitting Prohibitions,"
The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 52(1), pages 241-271.
- Guimaraes, Bernardo & Salama, Bruno Meyerhof, 2021. "Permitting prohibitions," Textos para discussão 544, FGV EESP - Escola de Economia de São Paulo, Fundação Getulio Vargas (Brazil).
- Richard Holden & Michael Keane & Matthew Lilley, 2021.
"Peer effects on the United States Supreme Court,"
Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 12(3), pages 981-1019, July.
- Richard Holden & Michael Keane & Matthew Lilley, 2017. "Peer Effects on the United States Supreme Court," Economics Papers 2017-W02, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
- Richard Holden & Michael Keane & Matthew Lilley, 2019. "Peer Effects on the United States Supreme Court," Discussion Papers 2019-01, School of Economics, The University of New South Wales.
- Richard Holden & Michael Keane & Matthew Lilley, 2020. "Peer Effects on the United States Supreme Court," Discussion Papers 2019-01b, School of Economics, The University of New South Wales.
- Clio Andris & David Lee & Marcus J Hamilton & Mauro Martino & Christian E Gunning & John Armistead Selden, 2015. "The Rise of Partisanship and Super-Cooperators in the U.S. House of Representatives," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14, April.
- Greg Morrison & L Mahadevan, 2012. "Discovering Communities through Friendship," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(7), pages 1-9, July.
- Mario Bergara & Barak Richman & Pablo T. Spiller, 2002. "Modeling Supreme Court Strategic Decision Making: Congressional Constraint," Documentos de Trabajo (working papers) 1402, Department of Economics - dECON.
- Nuno Garoupa & Marian Gili & Fernando Gómez‐Pomar, 2012. "Political Influence and Career Judges: An Empirical Analysis of Administrative Review by the Spanish Supreme Court," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(4), pages 795-826, December.
- Christoph Engel, 2024. "The German Constitutional Court – Activist, but not Partisan?," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2024_04, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
- Jivas Chakravarthy, 2019. "Ideological diversity in standard setting," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 113-155, March.
- Saul Brenner & Robert H. Dorff, 1992. "The Attitudinal Model and Fluidity Voting on the United States Supreme Court," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 4(2), pages 195-205, April.
- Guimaraesy, Bernardo & Meyerhof Salama, Bruno, 2017. "Contingent judicial deference: theory and application to usury laws," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 86146, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Noah Giansiracusa, 2023. "Branching on the bench: quantifying division in the supreme court with trees," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 36-58, March.
- Hossain, Ashrafee & Rjiba, Hatem & Saadi, Samir, 2022. "Judge Ideology and Corporate Sexual Orientation Equality," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
- Garoupa, Nuno & Gili, Marian & Gómez Pomar, Fernando, 2021. "Loyalty to the party or loyalty to the party leader: Evidence from the Spanish Constitutional Court," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
- Garoupa, Nuno & Grembi, Veronica, 2015. "Judicial review and political partisanship: Moving from consensual to majoritarian democracy," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 32-45.
- Karakas, Leyla D., 2017. "Political rents under alternative forms of judicial review," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 86-96.
- Amaral-Garcia Sofia & Garoupa Nuno, 2017.
"Judicial Behavior and Devolution at the Privy Council,"
Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 13(3), pages 1-40, November.
- Sofia Amaral-Garcia & Nuno Garoupa, 2017. "Judicial Behavior and Devolution at the Privy Council," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/301461, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
- Sofia Amaral-Garcia & Nuno Garoupa, 2017. "Judicial Behavior and Devolution at the Privy Council," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1643, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0027188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.