IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0024165.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Global Trends and Factors Associated with the Illegal Killing of Elephants: A Hierarchical Bayesian Analysis of Carcass Encounter Data

Author

Listed:
  • Robert W Burn
  • Fiona M Underwood
  • Julian Blanc

Abstract

Elephant poaching and the ivory trade remain high on the agenda at meetings of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). Well-informed debates require robust estimates of trends, the spatial distribution of poaching, and drivers of poaching. We present an analysis of trends and drivers of an indicator of elephant poaching of all elephant species. The site-based monitoring system known as Monitoring the Illegal Killing of Elephants (MIKE), set up by the 10th Conference of the Parties of CITES in 1997, produces carcass encounter data reported mainly by anti-poaching patrols. Data analyzed were site by year totals of 6,337 carcasses from 66 sites in Africa and Asia from 2002–2009. Analysis of these observational data is a serious challenge to traditional statistical methods because of the opportunistic and non-random nature of patrols, and the heterogeneity across sites. Adopting a Bayesian hierarchical modeling approach, we used the proportion of carcasses that were illegally killed (PIKE) as a poaching index, to estimate the trend and the effects of site- and country-level factors associated with poaching. Important drivers of illegal killing that emerged at country level were poor governance and low levels of human development, and at site level, forest cover and area of the site in regions where human population density is low. After a drop from 2002, PIKE remained fairly constant from 2003 until 2006, after which it increased until 2008. The results for 2009 indicate a decline. Sites with PIKE ranging from the lowest to the highest were identified. The results of the analysis provide a sound information base for scientific evidence-based decision making in the CITES process.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert W Burn & Fiona M Underwood & Julian Blanc, 2011. "Global Trends and Factors Associated with the Illegal Killing of Elephants: A Hierarchical Bayesian Analysis of Carcass Encounter Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-10, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0024165
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024165
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0024165
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0024165&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0024165?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Milner-Gulland, E.J. & Rowcliffe, J. Marcus, 2007. "Conservation and Sustainable Use: A Handbook of Techniques," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198530350.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fiona M Underwood & Robert W Burn & Tom Milliken, 2013. "Dissecting the Illegal Ivory Trade: An Analysis of Ivory Seizures Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(10), pages 1-12, October.
    2. Jean-Louis Kouakou & Sery Gonedelé Bi & Eloi Anderson Bitty & Célestin Kouakou & Alphonse Kouassi Yao & Kouadio Bénoîtype Kassé & Soulemane Ouattara, 2020. "Ivory Coast without ivory: Massive extinction of African forest elephants in Côte d’Ivoire," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-14, October.
    3. Solomon Hsiang & Nitin Sekar, 2016. "Does Legalization Reduce Black Market Activity? Evidence from a Global Ivory Experiment and Elephant Poaching Data," NBER Working Papers 22314, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Rashidi, Parinaz & Wang, Tiejun & Skidmore, Andrew & Vrieling, Anton & Darvishzadeh, Roshanak & Toxopeus, Bert & Ngene, Shadrack & Omondi, Patrick, 2015. "Spatial and spatiotemporal clustering methods for detecting elephant poaching hotspots," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 297(C), pages 180-186.
    5. Rashidi, Parinaz & Wang, Tiejun & Skidmore, Andrew & Mehdipoor, Hamed & Darvishzadeh, Roshanak & Ngene, Shadrack & Vrieling, Anton & Toxopeus, Albertus G., 2016. "Elephant poaching risk assessed using spatial and non-spatial Bayesian models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 338(C), pages 60-68.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rakotonarivo, O. Sarobidy & Bredahl Jacobsen, Jette & Poudyal, Mahesh & Rasoamanana, Alexandra & Hockley, Neal, 2018. "Estimating welfare impacts where property rights are contested: methodological and policy implications," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 71-83.
    2. Rocío Ponce Reyes & Jennifer Firn & Sam Nicol & Iadine Chadès & Danial S Stratford & Tara G Martin & Stuart Whitten & Josie Carwardine, 2019. "Building a stakeholder-led common vision increases the expected cost-effectiveness of biodiversity conservation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, June.
    3. L. Richard Little & Brenda B. Lin, 2017. "A decision analysis approach to climate adaptation: a structured method to consider multiple options," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 15-28, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0024165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.