IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0020721.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When Models Interact with Their Subjects: The Dynamics of Model Aware Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Dervis Can Vural

Abstract

A scientific model need not be a passive and static descriptor of its subject. If the subject is affected by the model, the model must be updated to explain its affected subject. In this study, two models regarding the dynamics of model aware systems are presented. The first explores the behavior of “prediction seeking” (PSP) and “prediction avoiding” (PSP) populations under the influence of a model that describes them. The second explores the publishing behavior of a group of experimentalists coupled to a model by means of confirmation bias. It is found that model aware systems can exhibit convergent random or oscillatory behavior and display universal 1/f noise. A numerical simulation of the physical experimentalists is compared with actual publications of neutron life time and mass measurements and is in good quantitative agreement.

Suggested Citation

  • Dervis Can Vural, 2011. "When Models Interact with Their Subjects: The Dynamics of Model Aware Systems," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(6), pages 1-6, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0020721
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020721
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0020721
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0020721&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0020721?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. C. Eisenegger & M. Naef & R. Snozzi & M. Heinrichs & E. Fehr, 2010. "Prejudice and truth about the effect of testosterone on human bargaining behaviour," Nature, Nature, vol. 463(7279), pages 356-359, January.
    2. E. Samanidou & E. Zschischang & D. Stauffer & T. Lux, 2007. "Agent-based Models of Financial Markets," Papers physics/0701140, arXiv.org.
    3. Garibaldi,Ubaldo & Scalas,Enrico, 2010. "Finitary Probabilistic Methods in Econophysics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521515597, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mundt, Philipp & Förster, Niels & Alfarano, Simone & Milaković, Mishael, 2014. "The real versus the financial economy: A global tale of stability versus volatility," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 8, pages 1-26.
    2. V. Alfi & L. Pietronero & A. Zaccaria, 2008. "Minimal Agent Based Model For The Origin And Self-Organization Of Stylized Facts In Financial Markets," Papers 0807.1888, arXiv.org.
    3. Marcelo Arbex & Justin M. Carre & Shawn N. Geniole & Enlinson Mattos, 2018. "Testosterone, personality traits and tax evasion," Working Papers 1801, University of Windsor, Department of Economics.
    4. David Vidal-Tomás & Simone Alfarano, 2020. "An agent-based early warning indicator for financial market instability," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 15(1), pages 49-87, January.
    5. Maximilian Beikirch & Torsten Trimborn, 2020. "Novel Insights in the Levy-Levy-Solomon Agent-Based Economic Market Model," Papers 2002.10222, arXiv.org.
    6. Wang, Guochao & Zheng, Shenzhou & Wang, Jun, 2019. "Complex and composite entropy fluctuation behaviors of statistical physics interacting financial model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 517(C), pages 97-113.
    7. Materassi, Donatello & Innocenti, Giacomo, 2009. "Unveiling the connectivity structure of financial networks via high-frequency analysis," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 388(18), pages 3866-3878.
    8. Bertram During & Nicos Georgiou & Enrico Scalas, 2016. "A stylized model for wealth distribution," Papers 1609.08978, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2021.
    9. Pearson, Matthew & Schipper, Burkhard C., 2013. "Menstrual cycle and competitive bidding," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1-20.
    10. A. O. Glekin & A. Lykov & K. L. Vaninsky, 2014. "On Simulation of Various Effects in Consolidated Order Book," Papers 1402.4150, arXiv.org.
    11. Ellis Scharfenaker, 2022. "Statistical Equilibrium Methods In Analytical Political Economy," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 276-309, April.
    12. Nils Bertschinger & Oliver Pfante, 2020. "Early Warning Signs of Financial Market Turmoils," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-24, November.
    13. Mimkes, Jürgen, 2010. "Stokes integral of economic growth," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(8), pages 1665-1676.
    14. Mayo, Robert, 2013. "Can Prospect Theory Explain Market Calendar Effects?," MPRA Paper 96719, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Sabiou Inoua, 2016. "The Random Walk behind Volatility Clustering," Papers 1612.09344, arXiv.org.
    16. Steven J. Stanton & Walter Sinnott-Armstrong & Scott A. Huettel, 2017. "Neuromarketing: Ethical Implications of its Use and Potential Misuse," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 144(4), pages 799-811, September.
    17. Tomonori Takahashi & Takayuki Mizuno, 2024. "Generation of synthetic financial time series by diffusion models," Papers 2410.18897, arXiv.org.
    18. Carsten de Dreu & Klarita Gërxhani & Arthur Schram, 2019. "Anticipating Peer Ranking Causes Hormonal Adaptations that Benefit Cognitive Performance," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 19-040/I, Tinbergen Institute.
    19. Linda Ponta & Silvano Cincotti, 2018. "Traders’ Networks of Interactions and Structural Properties of Financial Markets: An Agent-Based Approach," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-9, January.
    20. Atushi Ishikawa & Takayuki Mizuno & Shouji Fujimoto, 2022. "Employee Number Dependence in Labor Productivity Distribution," The Review of Socionetwork Strategies, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 465-477, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0020721. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.