IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0020471.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Common Polymorphisms rs11614913 in miR-196a2 and rs2910164 in miR-146a on Cancer Susceptibility: A Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Xu
  • Jijun Xu
  • Shifeng Liu
  • Bo Chen
  • Xueli Wang
  • Yan Li
  • Yun Qian
  • Weihong Zhao
  • Jianqing Wu

Abstract

Background: MicroRNAs regulate gene expression at the post-transcriptional level and involved in diverse biological and pathological processes, including tumorigenesis. Rs11614913 in miR-196a2 and rs2910164 in miR-146a are shown to associate with increased/decreased cancer risk. We performed a meta-analysis to systematically summarize the possible association. Methodology/Principal Findings: We assessed published studies of the association between these microRNA polymorphisms and cancer risk from eleven studies with 16,771 subjects for miR-196a2 and from ten studies with 15,126 subjects for miR-146a. As for rs11614913, the contrast of homozygote (TT vs CC: OR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.85–0.99, Pheterogeneity = 0.45), allele (T vs C: OR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.92–0.99, Pheterogeneity = 0.61) and recessive model (OR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.84–0.97, Pheterogeneity = 0.50) produced statistically association. Subgroup analysis by ethnicity, statistically significantly decreased cancer risks were found among Asians for allele contrast (OR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.90–0.99, Pheterogeneity = 0.74) and the recessive genetic model (OR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.82–0.98, Pheterogeneity = 0.85). According to subgroup analysis by tumor types, the protective effect of C/T polymorphism was only found in breast cancer under allele contrast (T vs C: OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.88–0.99, Pheterogeneity = 0.26). For rs2910164, no significant associations were found among overall analysis model with relatively large heterogeneity. Through the stratified analysis, heterogeneity decreased significantly. In the subgroup analyses by cancer types, the C allele of rs2910164 was associated with protection from digestive cancer in allele contrast (C vs G: OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.77–0.96, Pheterogeneity = 0.51). Conclusions/Significance: Our meta-analysis suggests that the rs11614913 most likely contributes to decreased susceptibility to cancer, especially in Asians and breast cancer. Besides, the C allele of the rs2910164 might be associated with a protection from digestive cancer.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Xu & Jijun Xu & Shifeng Liu & Bo Chen & Xueli Wang & Yan Li & Yun Qian & Weihong Zhao & Jianqing Wu, 2011. "Effects of Common Polymorphisms rs11614913 in miR-196a2 and rs2910164 in miR-146a on Cancer Susceptibility: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(5), pages 1-7, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0020471
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020471
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0020471
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0020471&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0020471?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fang Wang & Guoping Sun & Yanfeng Zou & Lulu Fan & Bing Song, 2012. "Lack of Association of miR-146a rs2910164 Polymorphism with Gastrointestinal Cancers: Evidence from 10206 Subjects," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(6), pages 1-7, June.
    2. Kshitij Srivastava & Anvesha Srivastava, 2012. "Comprehensive Review of Genetic Association Studies and Meta-Analyses on miRNA Polymorphisms and Cancer Risk," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-1, November.
    3. Zhongxia Wang & Yin Cao & Chunping Jiang & Guang Yang & Junhua Wu & Yitao Ding, 2012. "Lack of Association of Two Common Polymorphisms rs2910164 and rs11614913 with Susceptibility to Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(6), pages 1-8, June.
    4. Jing Guo & Mingjuan Jin & Mingwu Zhang & Kun Chen, 2012. "A Genetic Variant in miR-196a2 Increased Digestive System Cancer Risks: A Meta-Analysis of 15 Case-Control Studies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(1), pages 1-7, January.
    5. Zhengrong Yuan & Xu Zeng & Dan Yang & Weilu Wang & Zhihua Liu, 2013. "Effects of Common Polymorphism rs11614913 in Hsa-miR-196a2 on Lung Cancer Risk," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-8, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0020471. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.