IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0009483.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development, Calibration, and Validation of a U.S. White Male Population-Based Simulation Model of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

Author

Listed:
  • Chin Hur
  • Tristan J Hayeck
  • Jennifer M Yeh
  • Ethan B Richards
  • Stuart J Spechler
  • G Scott Gazelle
  • Chung Yin Kong

Abstract

Background: The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) has risen rapidly in the U.S. and western world. The aim of the study was to begin the investigation of this rapid rise by developing, calibrating, and validating a mathematical disease simulation model of EAC using available epidemiologic data. Methods: The model represents the natural history of EAC, including the essential biologic health states from normal mucosa to detected cancer. Progression rates between health states were estimated via calibration, which identified distinct parameter sets producing model outputs that fit epidemiologic data; specifically, the prevalence of pre-cancerous lesions and EAC cancer incidence from the published literature and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data. As an illustrative example of a clinical and policy application, the calibrated and validated model retrospectively analyzed the potential benefit of an aspirin chemoprevention program. Results: Model outcomes approximated calibration targets; results of the model's fit and validation are presented. Approximately 7,000 cases of EAC could have been prevented over a 30-year period if all white males started aspirin chemoprevention at age 40 in 1965. Conclusions: The model serves as the foundation for future analyses to determine a cost-effective screening and management strategy to prevent EAC morbidity and mortality.

Suggested Citation

  • Chin Hur & Tristan J Hayeck & Jennifer M Yeh & Ethan B Richards & Stuart J Spechler & G Scott Gazelle & Chung Yin Kong, 2010. "Development, Calibration, and Validation of a U.S. White Male Population-Based Simulation Model of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(3), pages 1-9, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0009483
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009483
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0009483
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0009483&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0009483?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Natasha Stout & Amy Knudsen & Chung Kong & Pamela McMahon & G. Gazelle, 2009. "Calibration Methods Used in Cancer Simulation Models and Suggested Reporting Guidelines," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 27(7), pages 533-545, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jing Voon Chen & Julia L. Higle & Michael Hintlian, 2018. "A systematic approach for examining the impact of calibration uncertainty in disease modeling," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 541-561, October.
    2. Ioannis Andrianakis & Ian R Vernon & Nicky McCreesh & Trevelyan J McKinley & Jeremy E Oakley & Rebecca N Nsubuga & Michael Goldstein & Richard G White, 2015. "Bayesian History Matching of Complex Infectious Disease Models Using Emulation: A Tutorial and a Case Study on HIV in Uganda," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, January.
    3. Matthew R Behrend & María-Gloria Basáñez & Jonathan I D Hamley & Travis C Porco & Wilma A Stolk & Martin Walker & Sake J de Vlas & for the NTD Modelling Consortium, 2020. "Modelling for policy: The five principles of the Neglected Tropical Diseases Modelling Consortium," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Douglas Taylor & Vivek Pawar & Denise Kruzikas & Kristen Gilmore & Myrlene Sanon & Milton Weinstein, 2012. "Incorporating Calibrated Model Parameters into Sensitivity Analyses," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 119-126, February.
    5. Carrie Lubitz & Ayman Ali & Tiannan Zhan & Curtis Heberle & Craig White & Yasuhiro Ito & Akira Miyauchi & G Scott Gazelle & Chung Yin Kong & Chin Hur, 2017. "The thyroid cancer policy model: A mathematical simulation model of papillary thyroid carcinoma in The U.S. population," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-15, May.
    6. Penny R. Breeze & Hazel Squires & Kate Ennis & Petra Meier & Kate Hayes & Nik Lomax & Alan Shiell & Frank Kee & Frank de Vocht & Martin O’Flaherty & Nigel Gilbert & Robin Purshouse & Stewart Robinson , 2023. "Guidance on the use of complex systems models for economic evaluations of public health interventions," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(7), pages 1603-1625, July.
    7. C Marijn Hazelbag & Jonathan Dushoff & Emanuel M Dominic & Zinhle E Mthombothi & Wim Delva, 2020. "Calibration of individual-based models to epidemiological data: A systematic review," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-17, May.
    8. Andrea L Ciaranello & Bethany L Morris & Rochelle P Walensky & Milton C Weinstein & Samuel Ayaya & Kathleen Doherty & Valeriane Leroy & Taige Hou & Sophie Desmonde & Zhigang Lu & Farzad Noubary & Kunj, 2013. "Validation and Calibration of a Computer Simulation Model of Pediatric HIV Infection," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-1, December.
    9. Tazio Vanni & Jonathan Karnon & Jason Madan & Richard White & W. Edmunds & Anna Foss & Rosa Legood, 2011. "Calibrating Models in Economic Evaluation," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 35-49, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0009483. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.