IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0008906.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Timing Robustness in the Budding and Fission Yeast Cell Cycles

Author

Listed:
  • Karan Mangla
  • David L Dill
  • Mark A Horowitz

Abstract

Robustness of biological models has emerged as an important principle in systems biology. Many past analyses of Boolean models update all pending changes in signals simultaneously (i.e., synchronously), making it impossible to consider robustness to variations in timing that result from noise and different environmental conditions. We checked previously published mathematical models of the cell cycles of budding and fission yeast for robustness to timing variations by constructing Boolean models and analyzing them using model-checking software for the property of speed independence. Surprisingly, the models are nearly, but not totally, speed-independent. In some cases, examination of timing problems discovered in the analysis exposes apparent inaccuracies in the model. Biologically justified revisions to the model eliminate the timing problems. Furthermore, in silico random mutations in the regulatory interactions of a speed-independent Boolean model are shown to be unlikely to preserve speed independence, even in models that are otherwise functional, providing evidence for selection pressure to maintain timing robustness. Multiple cell cycle models exhibit strong robustness to timing variation, apparently due to evolutionary pressure. Thus, timing robustness can be a basis for generating testable hypotheses and can focus attention on aspects of a model that may need refinement.

Suggested Citation

  • Karan Mangla & David L Dill & Mark A Horowitz, 2010. "Timing Robustness in the Budding and Fission Yeast Cell Cycles," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(2), pages 1-7, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0008906
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008906
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0008906
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0008906&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0008906?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David A. Orlando & Charles Y. Lin & Allister Bernard & Jean Y. Wang & Joshua E. S. Socolar & Edwin S. Iversen & Alexander J. Hartemink & Steven B. Haase, 2008. "Global control of cell-cycle transcription by coupled CDK and network oscillators," Nature, Nature, vol. 453(7197), pages 944-947, June.
    2. Jasmin Fisher & Nir Piterman & Alex Hajnal & Thomas A Henzinger, 2007. "Predictive Modeling of Signaling Crosstalk during C. elegans Vulval Development," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(5), pages 1-12, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Lobo & Michael Levin, 2015. "Inferring Regulatory Networks from Experimental Morphological Phenotypes: A Computational Method Reverse-Engineers Planarian Regeneration," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-28, June.
    2. Alessandro Romanel & Lars Juhl Jensen & Luca Cardelli & Attila Csikász-Nagy, 2012. "Transcriptional Regulation Is a Major Controller of Cell Cycle Transition Dynamics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(1), pages 1-9, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0008906. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.