IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0002402.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Detailed Analysis of the Murine TAP Transporter Substrate Specificity

Author

Listed:
  • Anne Burgevin
  • Loredana Saveanu
  • Yohan Kim
  • Émilie Barilleau
  • Maya Kotturi
  • Alessandro Sette
  • Peter van Endert
  • Bjoern Peters

Abstract

Background: The transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP) supplies cytosolic peptides into the endoplasmic reticulum for binding to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules. Its specificity therefore influences the repertoire of peptides presented by MHC molecules. Compared to human TAP, murine TAP's binding specificity has not been characterized as well, even though murine systems are widely used for basic studies of antigen processing and presentation. Methodology/Principal Findings: We performed a detailed experimental analysis of murine TAP binding specificity by measuring the binding affinities of 323 peptides. Based on this experimental data, a computational model of murine TAP specificity was constructed. The model was compared to previously generated data on human and murine TAP specificities. In addition, the murine TAP specificities for known epitopes and random peptides were predicted and compared to assess the impact of murine TAP selectivity on epitope selection. Conclusions/Significance: Comparisons to a previously constructed model of human TAP specificity confirms the well-established differences for peptide substrates with positively charged C-termini. In addition these comparisons show that several residues at the N-terminus of peptides which strongly influence binding to human TAP showed little effect on binding to murine TAP, and that the overall influence of the aminoterminal residues on peptide affinity for murine TAP is much lower than for the human transporter. Murine TAP also partly prefers different hydrophobic amino acids than human TAP in the carboxyterminal position. These species-dependent differences in specificity determined in vitro are shown to correlate with the epitope repertoire recognized in vivo. The quantitative model of binding specificity of murine TAP developed herein should be useful for interpreting epitope mapping and immunogenicity data obtained in humanized mouse models.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne Burgevin & Loredana Saveanu & Yohan Kim & Émilie Barilleau & Maya Kotturi & Alessandro Sette & Peter van Endert & Bjoern Peters, 2008. "A Detailed Analysis of the Murine TAP Transporter Substrate Specificity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(6), pages 1-8, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0002402
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002402
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0002402
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0002402&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0002402?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David G. Bowen & Christopher M. Walker, 2005. "Adaptive immune responses in acute and chronic hepatitis C virus infection," Nature, Nature, vol. 436(7053), pages 946-952, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kieran English & Rain Kwan & Lauren E. Holz & Claire McGuffog & Jelte M. M. Krol & Daryan Kempe & Tsuneyasu Kaisho & William R. Heath & Leszek Lisowski & Maté Biro & Geoffrey W. McCaughan & David G. B, 2024. "A hepatic network of dendritic cells mediates CD4 T cell help outside lymphoid organs," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0002402. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.