IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0002400.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Predation on Animal Prey Abundance: Evidence from UK Vertebrates

Author

Listed:
  • Alison R Holt
  • Zoe G Davies
  • Claire Tyler
  • Samantha Staddon

Abstract

Background: Controlling vertebrate predators is one of the most widespread forms of wildlife management and it continues to cause conflict between stakeholders worldwide. It is important for managers and policy-makers to make decisions on this issue that are based on the best available scientific evidence. Therefore, it is first important to understand if there is indeed an impact of vertebrate predators on prey, and then to quantify this impact. Methodology/Principal Findings: Using the UK as a case study, we use a meta-analytical approach to review the available evidence to assess the effect of vertebrate predation on animal prey abundance. We find a significant effect of predators on prey abundance across our studies. On average, there is a 1.6 fold increase in prey abundance in the absence of predation. However, we show significant heterogeneity in effect sizes, and discuss how the method of predator control, whether the predator is native or non-native, and aspects of study design, may be potential causes. Conclusions/Significance: Our results allow some cautious policy recommendations to be made regarding the management of predator and prey populations. Meta-analysis is an important tool for understanding general patterns in the effect of predators on prey abundance across studies. Such an approach is especially valuable where management decisions need to be made in the absence of site-specific information.

Suggested Citation

  • Alison R Holt & Zoe G Davies & Claire Tyler & Samantha Staddon, 2008. "Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Predation on Animal Prey Abundance: Evidence from UK Vertebrates," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(6), pages 1-8, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0002400
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002400
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0002400
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0002400&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0002400?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Genevieve C. Perkins & Amanda E. Martin & Adam C. Smith & Lenore Fahrig, 2021. "Weak Effects of Owned Outdoor Cat Density on Urban Bird Richness and Abundance," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Liang, Ziwei & Meng, Xinyou, 2023. "Stability and Hopf bifurcation of a multiple delayed predator–prey system with fear effect, prey refuge and Crowley–Martin function," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 175(P1).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0002400. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.