IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0009700.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating underreporting of leprosy in Brazil using a Bayesian approach

Author

Listed:
  • Guilherme L de Oliveira
  • Juliane F Oliveira
  • Júlia M Pescarini
  • Roberto F S Andrade
  • Joilda S Nery
  • Maria Y Ichihara
  • Liam Smeeth
  • Elizabeth B Brickley
  • Maurício L Barreto
  • Gerson O Penna
  • Maria L F Penna
  • Mauro N Sanchez

Abstract

Background: Leprosy remains concentrated among the poorest communities in low-and middle-income countries and it is one of the primary infectious causes of disability. Although there have been increasing advances in leprosy surveillance worldwide, leprosy underreporting is still common and can hinder decision-making regarding the distribution of financial and health resources and thereby limit the effectiveness of interventions. In this study, we estimated the proportion of unreported cases of leprosy in Brazilian microregions. Methodology/Principal findings: Using data collected between 2007 to 2015 from each of the 557 Brazilian microregions, we applied a Bayesian hierarchical model that used the presence of grade 2 leprosy-related physical disabilities as a direct indicator of delayed diagnosis and a proxy for the effectiveness of local leprosy surveillance program. We also analyzed some relevant factors that influence spatial variability in the observed mean incidence rate in the Brazilian microregions, highlighting the importance of socioeconomic factors and how they affect the levels of underreporting. We corrected leprosy incidence rates for each Brazilian microregion and estimated that, on average, 33,252 (9.6%) new leprosy cases went unreported in the country between 2007 to 2015, with this proportion varying from 8.4% to 14.1% across the Brazilian States. Conclusions/Significance: The magnitude and distribution of leprosy underreporting were adequately explained by a model using Grade 2 disability as a marker for the ability of the system to detect new missing cases. The percentage of missed cases was significant, and efforts are warranted to improve leprosy case detection. Our estimates in Brazilian microregions can be used to guide effective interventions, efficient resource allocation, and target actions to mitigate transmission. Author summary: Leprosy remains an important public health problem that affects vulnerable populations in low- and middle-income countries. In this study, we estimated how many cases were not detected in each Brazilian microregion by the surveillance system during the period of 2007 until 2015. Using a mathematical model, we found out that around 10% of the estimated number of cases occurring in the country in the study period were missed by the health system, and this represented over 33 thousand cases overall. These findings are important as undetected and therefore untreated cases can progress and lead to lifelong disabilities. In addition, missing cases prevents the health system from evaluating exposed contacts, which could lead to further delays in diagnosis. Describing the magnitude, location and correlates of leprosy underreporting at the microregional level will inform the efforts of policymakers and program managers in designing interventions and allocating resources to achieve leprosy control targets.

Suggested Citation

  • Guilherme L de Oliveira & Juliane F Oliveira & Júlia M Pescarini & Roberto F S Andrade & Joilda S Nery & Maria Y Ichihara & Liam Smeeth & Elizabeth B Brickley & Maurício L Barreto & Gerson O Penna & M, 2021. "Estimating underreporting of leprosy in Brazil using a Bayesian approach," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-13, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0009700
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009700
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0009700
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0009700&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009700?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Julia Moreira Pescarini & Agostino Strina & Joilda Silva Nery & Lacita Menezes Skalinski & Kaio Vinicius Freitas de Andrade & Maria Lucia F Penna & Elizabeth B Brickley & Laura C Rodrigues & Mauricio , 2018. "Socioeconomic risk markers of leprosy in high-burden countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Trang VoPham & Matthew D. Weaver & Gary Adamkiewicz & Jaime E. Hart, 2021. "Social Distancing Associations with COVID-19 Infection and Mortality Are Modified by Crowding and Socioeconomic Status," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-8, April.
    2. Xiang Li & Jing Yang & Lianhua Zhang & Guangjie Jin & Li Xu & Fujin Fang & Yunhui Li & Pingmin Wei, 2022. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Leprosy during 2000–2021 from Web of Science Database," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-14, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0009700. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.