IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0008832.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost of a new method of active screening for human African trypanosomiasis in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

Author

Listed:
  • Rian Snijders
  • Alain Fukinsia
  • Yves Claeys
  • Alain Mpanya
  • Epco Hasker
  • Filip Meheus
  • Erick Miaka
  • Marleen Boelaert

Abstract

Background: Human African trypanosomiases caused by the Trypanosoma brucei gambiense parasite is a lethal disease targeted for eradication. One of the main disease control strategies is active case-finding through outreach campaigns. In 2014, a new method for active screening was developed with mini, motorcycle-based, teams. This study compares the cost of two active case-finding approaches, namely the traditional mobile teams and mini mobile teams, in the two health districts of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Methods: The financial and economic costs of both approaches were estimated from a health care provider perspective. Cost and operational data were collected for 12 months for 1 traditional team and 3 mini teams. The cost per person screened and diagnosed was calculated and univariate sensitivity analysis was conducted to identify the main cost drivers. Results: During the study period in total 264,630 people were screened, and 23 HAT cases detected. The cost per person screened was lower for a mini team than for a traditional team in the study setting (US$1.86 versus US$2.08). A comparable result was found in a scenario analysis, assuming both teams would operate in a similar setting, with the cost per person screened by a mini team 15% lower than the cost per person screened by a traditional team (1.86 $ vs 2.14$). The main explanations for this lower cost are that mini teams work with fewer human resources, cheaper means of transportation and do not perform the Capillary Tube Centrifugation test or card agglutination test dilutions. Discussion: Active HAT screening with mini mobile teams has a lower cost and could be a cost-effective alternative for active case-finding. Further research is needed to determine if mini mobile teams have similar or better yields than traditional mobile teams in terms of detections and cases successfully treated. Author summary: Human African Trypanosomiasis (HAT) used to be a major public health problem in Sub-Saharan Africa, but the disease is becoming less frequent as a result of sustained control efforts. Currently, the elimination of sleeping sickness as a public health problem is targeted for 2020 and eradication or interruption of transmission for 2030. To achieve these targets, a commitment of at least 10 years towards HAT control activities will be necessary with innovative disease control approaches accompanied by economic evaluations to assess their cost and cost-effectiveness in the changing context. Today, active case finding via mass outreach campaigns accounts for approximately half of all identified cases in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. However, this strategy has become less efficient, with a dwindling “yield” in terms of the number of identified cases, translating to a higher cost per diagnosed HAT case. Therefore, different approaches to outreach campaigns need to be evaluated with a focus on reaching populations at risk for HAT.

Suggested Citation

  • Rian Snijders & Alain Fukinsia & Yves Claeys & Alain Mpanya & Epco Hasker & Filip Meheus & Erick Miaka & Marleen Boelaert, 2020. "Cost of a new method of active screening for human African trypanosomiasis in the Democratic Republic of the Congo," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0008832
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008832
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0008832
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0008832&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008832?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. C Simone Sutherland & Joshua Yukich & Ron Goeree & Fabrizio Tediosi, 2015. "A Literature Review of Economic Evaluations for a Neglected Tropical Disease: Human African Trypanosomiasis (“Sleeping Sickness”)," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-22, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marina Antillon & Ching-I Huang & Ronald E. Crump & Paul E. Brown & Rian Snijders & Erick Mwamba Miaka & Matt J. Keeling & Kat S. Rock & Fabrizio Tediosi, 2022. "Cost-effectiveness of sleeping sickness elimination campaigns in five settings of the Democratic Republic of Congo," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Harwin de Vries & Joris van de Klundert & Albert Wagelmans, 2021. "Toward Elimination of Infectious Diseases with Mobile Screening Teams: HAT in the DRC," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(10), pages 3408-3428, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paul R Bessell & Crispin Lumbala & Pascal Lutumba & Sylvain Baloji & Sylvain Biéler & Joseph M Ndung'u, 2018. "Cost-effectiveness of using a rapid diagnostic test to screen for human African trypanosomiasis in the Democratic Republic of the Congo," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0008832. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.