IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0004784.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Schistosomiasis Clinical Trials Landscape: A Systematic Review of Antischistosomal Treatment Efficacy Studies and a Case for Sharing Individual Participant-Level Data (IPD)

Author

Listed:
  • Amélie M Julé
  • Michel Vaillant
  • Trudie A Lang
  • Philippe J Guérin
  • Piero L Olliaro

Abstract

Background: Schistosomiasis control mainly relies on preventive chemotherapy with praziquantel (PZQ) distributed through mass drug administration. With a target of 260 million treatments yearly, reliably assessing and monitoring efficacy is all-important. Recommendations for treatment and control of schistosomiasis are supported by systematic reviews and meta-analyses of aggregated data, which however also point to limitations due to heterogeneity in trial design, analyses and reporting. Some such limitations could be corrected through access to individual participant-level data (IPD), which facilitates standardised analyses. Methodology: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify antischistosomal drug efficacy studies performed since 2000; including electronic searches of the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group specialised register and the Cochrane Library, PubMed, CENTRAL and Embase; complemented with a manual search for articles listed in past reviews. Antischistosomal treatment studies with assessment of outcome within 60 days post-treatment were eligible. Meta-data, i.e. study-level characteristics (Schistosoma species, number of patients, drug administered, country, etc.) and efficacy parameters were extracted from published documents to evaluate the scope of an individual-level data sharing platform. Principal findings: Out of 914 documents screened, 90 studies from 26 countries were included, enrolling 20,517 participants infected with Schistosoma spp. and treated with different PZQ regimens or other drugs. Methodologies varied in terms of diagnostic approaches (number of samples and test repeats), time of outcome assessment, and outcome measure (cure rate or egg reduction rate, as an arithmetic or geometric mean), making direct comparison of published data difficult. Conclusions: This review describes the landscape of schistosomiasis clinical research. The volume of data and the methodological and reporting heterogeneity identified all indicate that there is scope for an individual participant-level database, to allow for standardised analyses. Author Summary: Schistosomiasis is a parasitic disease prevalent in tropical climates, especially Africa. To control morbidity and eventually eliminate the disease, the World Health Organisation recommends that populations living in endemic areas be preventively treated with praziquantel. This means hundreds of million treatments over time, which calls for careful monitoring of drug efficacy. Meta-analyses of aggregated data from clinical trials support this policy, but conclusions are limited because studies use diverse methodologies, and detailed analyses (e.g. by age-groups) are not possible. Access to primary data generated by trials would strengthen the evidence and allow answering key questions, such as what the optimum paediatric dose is. This review assesses the number of trials conducted on antischistosomal drugs and their characteristics (where studies were conducted, in which population, what drug(s)/dose(s) were administered, and the methodologies applied), to determine the merit and scope of a common database of antischistosomal efficacy data.

Suggested Citation

  • Amélie M Julé & Michel Vaillant & Trudie A Lang & Philippe J Guérin & Piero L Olliaro, 2016. "The Schistosomiasis Clinical Trials Landscape: A Systematic Review of Antischistosomal Treatment Efficacy Studies and a Case for Sharing Individual Participant-Level Data (IPD)," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0004784
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004784
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0004784
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0004784&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0004784?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Piero L Olliaro & Jean T Coulibaly & Amadou Garba & Christine Halleux & Jennifer Keiser & Charles H King & Francisca Mutapi & Eliézer K N’Goran & Giovanna Raso & Alexandra U Scherrer & José Carlos Sou, 2020. "Efficacy and safety of single-dose 40 mg/kg oral praziquantel in the treatment of schistosomiasis in preschool-age versus school-age children: An individual participant data meta-analysis," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-23, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0004784. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.