IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pmed00/1001009.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Best Practice in Systematic Reviews: The Importance of Protocols and Registration

Author

Listed:
  • The PLoS Medicine Editors

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • The PLoS Medicine Editors, 2011. "Best Practice in Systematic Reviews: The Importance of Protocols and Registration," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-2, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1001009
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1001009
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1001009&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jamie J Kirkham & Doug G Altman & Paula R Williamson, 2010. "Bias Due to Changes in Specified Outcomes during the Systematic Review Process," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(3), pages 1-5, March.
    2. Joseph S Ross & Gregory K Mulvey & Elizabeth M Hines & Steven E Nissen & Harlan M Krumholz, 2009. "Trial Publication after Registration in ClinicalTrials.Gov: A Cross-Sectional Analysis," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-9, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nikolaos Pandis & Padhraig S Fleming & Helen Worthington & Kerry Dwan & Georgia Salanti, 2015. "Discrepancies in Outcome Reporting Exist Between Protocols and Published Oral Health Cochrane Systematic Reviews," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-10, September.
    2. Roberta W Scherer & Pamela C Sieving & Ann-Margret Ervin & Kay Dickersin, 2012. "Can We Depend on Investigators to Identify and Register Randomized Controlled Trials?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-6, September.
    3. Diana de la Iglesia & Miguel García-Remesal & Alberto Anguita & Miguel Muñoz-Mármol & Casimir Kulikowski & Víctor Maojo, 2014. "A Machine Learning Approach to Identify Clinical Trials Involving Nanodrugs and Nanodevices from ClinicalTrials.gov," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-15, October.
    4. Liu Xuemei & Li Youping & Yin Senlin & Song Shangqi, 2010. "Result Publication of Chinese Trials in World Health Organization Primary Registries," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(9), pages 1-7, September.
    5. Hassan Haes Alhelou & Mohamad Esmail Hamedani-Golshan & Takawira Cuthbert Njenda & Pierluigi Siano, 2019. "A Survey on Power System Blackout and Cascading Events: Research Motivations and Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-28, February.
    6. Hiroki Saito & Christopher J Gill, 2014. "How Frequently Do the Results from Completed US Clinical Trials Enter the Public Domain? - A Statistical Analysis of the ClinicalTrials.gov Database," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(7), pages 1-9, July.
    7. Areti Angeliki Veroniki & Jesmin Antony & Sharon E Straus & Huda M Ashoor & Yaron Finkelstein & Paul A Khan & Marco Ghassemi & Erik Blondal & John D Ivory & Brian Hutton & Kevin Gough & Brenda R Hemme, 2018. "Comparative safety and effectiveness of perinatal antiretroviral therapies for HIV-infected women and their children: Systematic review and network meta-analysis including different study designs," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-23, June.
    8. Danlu Liu & Jiaxin Jin & Jinhui Tian & Kehu Yang, 2015. "Quality Assessment and Factor Analysis of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Endoscopic Ultrasound Diagnosis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-13, April.
    9. Hassan Haes Alhelou & Mohamad-Esmail Hamedani-Golshan & Reza Zamani & Ehsan Heydarian-Forushani & Pierluigi Siano, 2018. "Challenges and Opportunities of Load Frequency Control in Conventional, Modern and Future Smart Power Systems: A Comprehensive Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-35, September.
    10. Sylvain Mathieu & An-Wen Chan & Philippe Ravaud, 2013. "Use of Trial Register Information during the Peer Review Process," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-4, April.
    11. Farihan Mohamad & Jiashen Teh, 2018. "Impacts of Energy Storage System on Power System Reliability: A Systematic Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-23, July.
    12. The PLoS Medicine Editors, 2009. "Ensuring Integrity in Comparative Effectiveness Research: Accentuate the Negative," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-2, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1001009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosmedicine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.