Author
Listed:
- Li Ma
- Andrew G Clark
- Alon Keinan
Abstract
Various methods have been developed for identifying gene–gene interactions in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). However, most methods focus on individual markers as the testing unit, and the large number of such tests drastically erodes statistical power. In this study, we propose novel interaction tests of quantitative traits that are gene-based and that confer advantage in both statistical power and biological interpretation. The framework of gene-based gene–gene interaction (GGG) tests combine marker-based interaction tests between all pairs of markers in two genes to produce a gene-level test for interaction between the two. The tests are based on an analytical formula we derive for the correlation between marker-based interaction tests due to linkage disequilibrium. We propose four GGG tests that extend the following P value combining methods: minimum P value, extended Simes procedure, truncated tail strength, and truncated P value product. Extensive simulations point to correct type I error rates of all tests and show that the two truncated tests are more powerful than the other tests in cases of markers involved in the underlying interaction not being directly genotyped and in cases of multiple underlying interactions. We applied our tests to pairs of genes that exhibit a protein–protein interaction to test for gene-level interactions underlying lipid levels using genotype data from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study. We identified five novel interactions that are not evident from marker-based interaction testing and successfully replicated one of these interactions, between SMAD3 and NEDD9, in an independent sample from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. We conclude that our GGG tests show improved power to identify gene-level interactions in existing, as well as emerging, association studies. Author Summary: Epistasis is likely to play a significant role in complex diseases or traits and is one of the many possible explanations for “missing heritability.” However, epistatic interactions have been difficult to detect in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) due to the limited power caused by the multiple-testing correction from the large number of tests conducted. Gene-based gene–gene interaction (GGG) tests might hold the key to relaxing the multiple-testing correction burden and increasing the power for identifying epistatic interactions in GWAS. Here, we developed GGG tests of quantitative traits by extending four P value combining methods and evaluated their type I error rates and power using extensive simulations. All four GGG tests are more powerful than a principal component-based test. We also applied our GGG tests to data from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study and found five gene-level interactions associated with the levels of total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). One interaction between SMAD3 and NEDD9 on HDL-C was further replicated in an independent sample from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.
Suggested Citation
Li Ma & Andrew G Clark & Alon Keinan, 2013.
"Gene-Based Testing of Interactions in Association Studies of Quantitative Traits,"
PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-12, February.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pgen00:1003321
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003321
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Simone Marini & Ivan Limongelli & Ettore Rizzo & Alberto Malovini & Edoardo Errichiello & Annalisa Vetro & Tan Da & Orsetta Zuffardi & Riccardo Bellazzi, 2016.
"A Data Fusion Approach to Enhance Association Study in Epilepsy,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, December.
- Emily Mathieu, 2016.
"AGGrEGATOr: A Gene-based GEne-Gene interActTiOn test for case-control association studies,"
Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 15(2), pages 151-171, April.
- Diana Chang & Feng Gao & Andrea Slavney & Li Ma & Yedael Y Waldman & Aaron J Sams & Paul Billing-Ross & Aviv Madar & Richard Spritz & Alon Keinan, 2014.
"Accounting for eXentricities: Analysis of the X Chromosome in GWAS Reveals X-Linked Genes Implicated in Autoimmune Diseases,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-31, December.
- Charlotte Wang & Wen-Hsin Kao & Chuhsing Kate Hsiao, 2015.
"Using Hamming Distance as Information for SNP-Sets Clustering and Testing in Disease Association Studies,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-24, August.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1003321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosgenetics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.