IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgen00/1002177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gene-Based Tests of Association

Author

Listed:
  • Hailiang Huang
  • Pritam Chanda
  • Alvaro Alonso
  • Joel S Bader
  • Dan E Arking

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are now used routinely to identify SNPs associated with complex human phenotypes. In several cases, multiple variants within a gene contribute independently to disease risk. Here we introduce a novel Gene-Wide Significance (GWiS) test that uses greedy Bayesian model selection to identify the independent effects within a gene, which are combined to generate a stronger statistical signal. Permutation tests provide p-values that correct for the number of independent tests genome-wide and within each genetic locus. When applied to a dataset comprising 2.5 million SNPs in up to 8,000 individuals measured for various electrocardiography (ECG) parameters, this method identifies more validated associations than conventional GWAS approaches. The method also provides, for the first time, systematic assessments of the number of independent effects within a gene and the fraction of disease-associated genes housing multiple independent effects, observed at 35%–50% of loci in our study. This method can be generalized to other study designs, retains power for low-frequency alleles, and provides gene-based p-values that are directly compatible for pathway-based meta-analysis. Author Summary: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have successfully identified genetic variants associated with complex human phenotypes. Despite a proliferation of analysis methods, most studies rely on simple, robust SNP–by–SNP univariate tests with ever-larger population sizes. Here we introduce a new test motivated by the biological hypothesis that a single gene may contain multiple variants that contribute independently to a trait. Applied to simulated phenotypes with real genotypes, our new method, Gene-Wide Significance (GWiS), has better power to identify true associations than traditional univariate methods, previous Bayesian methods, popular L1 regularized (LASSO) multivariate regression, and other approaches. GWiS retains power for low-frequency alleles that are increasingly important for personal genetics, and it is the only method tested that accurately estimates the number of independent effects within a gene. When applied to human data for multiple ECG traits, GWiS identifies more genome-wide significant loci (verified by meta-analyses of much larger populations) than any other method. We estimate that 35%–50% of ECG trait loci are likely to have multiple independent effects, suggesting that our method will reveal previously unidentified associations when applied to existing data and will improve power for future association studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Hailiang Huang & Pritam Chanda & Alvaro Alonso & Joel S Bader & Dan E Arking, 2011. "Gene-Based Tests of Association," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(7), pages 1-15, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1002177
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1002177
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1002177&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002177?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Emily Mathieu, 2016. "AGGrEGATOr: A Gene-based GEne-Gene interActTiOn test for case-control association studies," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 15(2), pages 151-171, April.
    2. Le Zhang & Chunqiu Zheng & Tian Li & Lei Xing & Han Zeng & Tingting Li & Huan Yang & Jia Cao & Badong Chen & Ziyuan Zhou, 2017. "Building Up a Robust Risk Mathematical Platform to Predict Colorectal Cancer," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-14, October.
    3. Diana Chang & Feng Gao & Andrea Slavney & Li Ma & Yedael Y Waldman & Aaron J Sams & Paul Billing-Ross & Aviv Madar & Richard Spritz & Alon Keinan, 2014. "Accounting for eXentricities: Analysis of the X Chromosome in GWAS Reveals X-Linked Genes Implicated in Autoimmune Diseases," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-31, December.
    4. Charlotte Wang & Wen-Hsin Kao & Chuhsing Kate Hsiao, 2015. "Using Hamming Distance as Information for SNP-Sets Clustering and Testing in Disease Association Studies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-24, August.
    5. Zheng Xu, 2023. "Association Testing of a Group of Genetic Markers Based on Next-Generation Sequencing Data and Continuous Response Using a Linear Model Framework," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-32, March.
    6. Pallav Bhatnagar & Emily Barron-Casella & Christopher J Bean & Jacqueline N Milton & Clinton T Baldwin & Martin H Steinberg & Michael DeBaun & James F Casella & Dan E Arking, 2013. "Genome-Wide Meta-Analysis of Systolic Blood Pressure in Children with Sickle Cell Disease," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-1, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1002177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosgenetics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.