IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgen00/0030074.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Method to Address Differential Bias in Genotyping in Large-Scale Association Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Vincent Plagnol
  • Jason D Cooper
  • John A Todd
  • David G Clayton

Abstract

In a previous paper we have shown that, when DNA samples for cases and controls are prepared in different laboratories prior to high-throughput genotyping, scoring inaccuracies can lead to differential misclassification and, consequently, to increased false-positive rates. Different DNA sourcing is often unavoidable in large-scale disease association studies of multiple case and control sets. Here, we describe methodological improvements to minimise such biases. These fall into two categories: improvements to the basic clustering methods for identifying genotypes from fluorescence intensities, and use of “fuzzy” calls in association tests in order to make appropriate allowance for call uncertainty. We find that the main improvement is a modification of the calling algorithm that links the clustering of cases and controls while allowing for different DNA sourcing. We also find that, in the presence of different DNA sourcing, biases associated with missing data can increase the false-positive rate. Therefore, we propose the use of “fuzzy” calls to deal with uncertain genotypes that would otherwise be labeled as missing.: Genome-wide disease association studies are becoming more common and involve genotyping cases and controls at a large number of SNP markers spread throughout the genome. We have shown previously that such studies can have an inflated false-positive rate, the result of genotype calling inaccuracies when DNA samples for cases and controls were prepared in different laboratories, prior to genotyping. Different DNA sourcing is often unavoidable in the large-scale association studies of multiple case and control sets. Here we describe methodological improvements to minimise such biases. These fall into two categories: improvements to the basic clustering methods for calling genotypes from fluorescence intensities, and use of “fuzzy” calls in association tests in order to make appropriate allowance for call uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Vincent Plagnol & Jason D Cooper & John A Todd & David G Clayton, 2007. "A Method to Address Differential Bias in Genotyping in Large-Scale Association Studies," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(5), pages 1-9, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:0030074
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030074
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.0030074
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.0030074&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgen.0030074?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zheng Xu & Song Yan & Cong Wu & Qing Duan & Sixia Chen & Yun Li, 2023. "Next-Generation Sequencing Data-Based Association Testing of a Group of Genetic Markers for Complex Responses Using a Generalized Linear Model Framework," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-28, June.
    2. Zheng Xu, 2023. "Association Testing of a Group of Genetic Markers Based on Next-Generation Sequencing Data and Continuous Response Using a Linear Model Framework," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-32, March.
    3. Ahn Kwangmi & Gordon Derek & Finch Stephen J, 2009. "Increase of Rejection Rate in Case-Control Studies with the Differential Genotyping Error Rates," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:0030074. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosgenetics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.