Author
Listed:
- Antonio de Candia
- Alessandro Sarracino
- Ilenia Apicella
- Lucilla de Arcangelis
Abstract
Spontaneous brain activity is characterized by bursts and avalanche-like dynamics, with scale-free features typical of critical behaviour. The stochastic version of the celebrated Wilson-Cowan model has been widely studied as a system of spiking neurons reproducing non-trivial features of the neural activity, from avalanche dynamics to oscillatory behaviours. However, to what extent such phenomena are related to the presence of a genuine critical point remains elusive. Here we address this central issue, providing analytical results in the linear approximation and extensive numerical analysis. In particular, we present results supporting the existence of a bona fide critical point, where a second-order-like phase transition occurs, characterized by scale-free avalanche dynamics, scaling with the system size and a diverging relaxation time-scale. Moreover, our study shows that the observed critical behaviour falls within the universality class of the mean-field branching process, where the exponents of the avalanche size and duration distributions are, respectively, 3/2 and 2. We also provide an accurate analysis of the system behaviour as a function of the total number of neurons, focusing on the time correlation functions of the firing rate in a wide range of the parameter space.Author summary: Networks of spiking neurons are introduced to describe some features of the brain activity, which are characterized by burst events (avalanches) with power-law distributions of size and duration. The observation of this kind of noisy behaviour in a wide variety of real systems led to the hypothesis that neuronal networks work in the proximity of a critical point. This hypothesis is at the core of an intense debate. At variance with previous claims, here we show that a stochastic version of the Wilson-Cowan model presents a phenomenology in agreement with the existence of a bona fide critical point for a particular choice of the relative synaptic weight between excitatory and inhibitory neurons. The system behaviour at this point shows all features typical of criticality, such as diverging timescales, scaling with the system size and scale-free distributions of avalanche sizes and durations, with exponents corresponding to the mean-field branching process. Our analysis unveils the critical nature of the observed behaviours.
Suggested Citation
Antonio de Candia & Alessandro Sarracino & Ilenia Apicella & Lucilla de Arcangelis, 2021.
"Critical behaviour of the stochastic Wilson-Cowan model,"
PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(8), pages 1-23, August.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1008884
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008884
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Menesse, Gustavo & Marin, Bóris & Girardi-Schappo, Mauricio & Kinouchi, Osame, 2022.
"Homeostatic criticality in neuronal networks,"
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
- Minati, Ludovico & Scarpetta, Silvia & Andelic, Mirna & Valdes-Sosa, Pedro A. & Ricci, Leonardo & de Candia, Antonio, 2024.
"First- and second-order phase transitions in electronic excitable units and neural dynamics under global inhibitory feedback,"
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
- Yang, JinHao & Ding, Yiming & Di, Zengru & Wang, DaHui, 2024.
"“All-or-none” dynamics and local-range dominated interaction leading to criticality in neural systems,"
Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 638(C).
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1008884. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.