Author
Listed:
- David R Berg
- Chetan P Offord
- Iris Kemler
- Matthew K Ennis
- Lawrence Chang
- George Paulik
- Zeljko Bajzer
- Claudia Neuhauser
- David Dingli
Abstract
Tumor therapy with replication competent viruses is an exciting approach to cancer eradication where viruses are engineered to specifically infect, replicate, spread and kill tumor cells. The outcome of tumor virotherapy is complex due to the variable interactions between the cancer cell and virus populations as well as the immune response. Oncolytic viruses are highly efficient in killing tumor cells in vitro, especially in a 2D monolayer of tumor cells, their efficiency is significantly lower in a 3D environment, both in vitro and in vivo. This indicates that the spatial dimension may have a major influence on the dynamics of virus spread. We study the dynamic behavior of a spatially explicit computational model of tumor and virus interactions using a combination of in vitro 2D and 3D experimental studies to inform the models. We determine the number of nearest neighbor tumor cells in 2D (median = 6) and 3D tumor spheroids (median = 16) and how this influences virus spread and the outcome of therapy. The parameter range leading to tumor eradication is small and even harder to achieve in 3D. The lower efficiency in 3D exists despite the presence of many more adjacent cells in the 3D environment that results in a shorter time to reach equilibrium. The mean field mathematical models generally used to describe tumor virotherapy appear to provide an overoptimistic view of the outcomes of therapy. Three dimensional space provides a significant barrier to efficient and complete virus spread within tumors and needs to be explicitly taken into account for virus optimization to achieve the desired outcome of therapy.Author summary: Tumor therapy with replicating oncolytic viruses is based on the premise that if the tumor specific virus infects and is amplified by the tumor population and spreads sufficiently within the tumor, it will lead to eradication of the cancer. The outcome of this approach is an exercise in population dynamics, and, as in ecology, depends on the detailed interactions between the various players involved. Mathematical models have been used to capture these dynamics, but space is often explicitly excluded from these models. We combine in vitro experiments studying tumor growth and virus spread in two and three dimensions to inform the development of a spatially explicit computational model of tumor virotherapy and compare the outcome with non-spatial, mean-field models. Viruses generally spread from cell to cell, and therefore the number of nearest neighbors close to an infected cell is important. Experimental data show that in three dimensions, the median number of nearest neighbors is 16 compared to 6 in the 2D plane. However, while simulations in 3D reach equilibrium faster than in 2D, tumor eradication is much less common in 3D than in 2D. Three dimensional space plays a critical role in the outcome of tumor virotherapy and this additional spatial dimension cannot be ignored in modeling.
Suggested Citation
David R Berg & Chetan P Offord & Iris Kemler & Matthew K Ennis & Lawrence Chang & George Paulik & Zeljko Bajzer & Claudia Neuhauser & David Dingli, 2019.
"In vitro and in silico multidimensional modeling of oncolytic tumor virotherapy dynamics,"
PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, March.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006773
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006773
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006773. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.