Author
Listed:
- Amrit Dhar
- Kristian Davidsen
- Frederick A Matsen IV
- Vladimir N Minin
Abstract
B cells develop high affinity receptors during the course of affinity maturation, a cyclic process of mutation and selection. At the end of affinity maturation, a number of cells sharing the same ancestor (i.e. in the same “clonal family”) are released from the germinal center; their amino acid frequency profile reflects the allowed and disallowed substitutions at each position. These clonal-family-specific frequency profiles, called “substitution profiles”, are useful for studying the course of affinity maturation as well as for antibody engineering purposes. However, most often only a single sequence is recovered from each clonal family in a sequencing experiment, making it impossible to construct a clonal-family-specific substitution profile. Given the public release of many high-quality large B cell receptor datasets, one may ask whether it is possible to use such data in a prediction model for clonal-family-specific substitution profiles. In this paper, we present the method “Substitution Profiles Using Related Families” (SPURF), a penalized tensor regression framework that integrates information from a rich assemblage of datasets to predict the clonal-family-specific substitution profile for any single input sequence. Using this framework, we show that substitution profiles from similar clonal families can be leveraged together with simulated substitution profiles and germline gene sequence information to improve prediction. We fit this model on a large public dataset and validate the robustness of our approach on two external datasets. Furthermore, we provide a command-line tool in an open-source software package (https://github.com/krdav/SPURF) implementing these ideas and providing easy prediction using our pre-fit models.Author summary: Antibody engineering can be greatly informed by knowledge about the underlying affinity maturation process. As such this can be probed by sequencing, but unfortunately, in practice often only one member of the clonal family is sequenced, making it difficult to determine a set of possible amino acid mutations that would retain the original antibody antigen binding affinity. We overcome this data sparsity by developing a statistical learning approach that leverages vast information about amino acid preferences available in public immune system repertoire data. We use a penalized regression approach to devise a flexible statistical model that integrates multiple sources of information into a coherent prediction framework and validate our prediction algorithm using subsampling and held out data.
Suggested Citation
Amrit Dhar & Kristian Davidsen & Frederick A Matsen IV & Vladimir N Minin, 2018.
"Predicting B cell receptor substitution profiles using public repertoire data,"
PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-24, October.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006388
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006388
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Duncan K Ralph & Frederick A Matsen IV, 2016.
"Likelihood-Based Inference of B Cell Clonal Families,"
PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-28, October.
- Duncan K Ralph & Frederick A Matsen IV, 2016.
"Consistency of VDJ Rearrangement and Substitution Parameters Enables Accurate B Cell Receptor Sequence Annotation,"
PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, January.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
- Nima Nouri & Steven H Kleinstein, 2020.
"Somatic hypermutation analysis for improved identification of B cell clonal families from next-generation sequencing data,"
PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-22, June.
- Duncan K Ralph & Frederick A Matsen IV, 2016.
"Likelihood-Based Inference of B Cell Clonal Families,"
PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-28, October.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006388. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.