IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1006081.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can a time varying external drive give rise to apparent criticality in neural systems?

Author

Listed:
  • Viola Priesemann
  • Oren Shriki

Abstract

The finding of power law scaling in neural recordings lends support to the hypothesis of critical brain dynamics. However, power laws are not unique to critical systems and can arise from alternative mechanisms. Here, we investigate whether a common time-varying external drive to a set of Poisson units can give rise to neuronal avalanches and exhibit apparent criticality. To this end, we analytically derive the avalanche size and duration distributions, as well as additional measures, first for homogeneous Poisson activity, and then for slowly varying inhomogeneous Poisson activity. We show that homogeneous Poisson activity cannot give rise to power law distributions. Inhomogeneous activity can also not generate perfect power laws, but it can exhibit approximate power laws with cutoffs that are comparable to those typically observed in experiments. The mechanism of generating apparent criticality by time-varying external fields, forces or input may generalize to many other systems like dynamics of swarms, diseases or extinction cascades. Here, we illustrate the analytically derived effects for spike recordings in vivo and discuss approaches to distinguish true from apparent criticality. Ultimately, this requires causal interventions, which allow separating internal system properties from externally imposed ones.Author summary: The analysis of complex systems in nature introduces several challenges, because typically a number of parameters either remain unobserved or cannot be controlled. In particular, it can be challenging to disentangle the dynamics generated within the system from that imposed by the environment. With this difficulty in mind, we reinvestigate the popular hypothesis that neural dynamics is poised close to a critical point. Criticality is characterized by power-law scaling and has been linked to favorable computational properties of networks. Power-law distributions for “neural avalanches,” i.e., spatio-temporal clusters of neural activity, have been observed in various neural systems and support the criticality hypothesis. Here we show that approximate power laws do not necessarily reflect critical network dynamics but can be imposed externally on non-critical networks, i.e., by driving the network with input of specific statistics. We derive these results analytically and illustrate them both in simulations and using neural recordings. The findings indicate that more caution and additional tests are required for distinguishing between genuine and apparent criticality. Ultimately, this requires causal interventions, not only in neural systems, but in many other complex dynamical systems that are subject to time-varying external forces, such as the dynamics of swarms, diseases or extinction cascades.

Suggested Citation

  • Viola Priesemann & Oren Shriki, 2018. "Can a time varying external drive give rise to apparent criticality in neural systems?," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-29, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006081
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006081
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006081&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006081?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shree Hari Gautam & Thanh T Hoang & Kylie McClanahan & Stephen K Grady & Woodrow L Shew, 2015. "Maximizing Sensory Dynamic Range by Tuning the Cortical State to Criticality," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas F Varley & Olaf Sporns & Aina Puce & John Beggs, 2020. "Differential effects of propofol and ketamine on critical brain dynamics," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-29, December.
    2. Bruno Del Papa & Viola Priesemann & Jochen Triesch, 2017. "Criticality meets learning: Criticality signatures in a self-organizing recurrent neural network," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, May.
    3. Safaeesirat, Amin & Moghimi-Araghi, Saman, 2022. "Critical behavior at the onset of synchronization in a neuronal model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 587(C).
    4. Forough Habibollahi & Brett J. Kagan & Anthony N. Burkitt & Chris French, 2023. "Critical dynamics arise during structured information presentation within embodied in vitro neuronal networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Yang, JinHao & Ding, Yiming & Di, Zengru & Wang, DaHui, 2024. "“All-or-none” dynamics and local-range dominated interaction leading to criticality in neural systems," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 638(C).
    6. Andrea K Barreiro & Shree Hari Gautam & Woodrow L Shew & Cheng Ly, 2017. "A theoretical framework for analyzing coupled neuronal networks: Application to the olfactory system," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-37, October.
    7. Brandon R. Munn & Eli J. Müller & Vicente Medel & Sharon L. Naismith & Joseph T. Lizier & Robert D. Sanders & James M. Shine, 2023. "Neuronal connected burst cascades bridge macroscale adaptive signatures across arousal states," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006081. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.