IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1004870.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maximum-Entropy Models of Sequenced Immune Repertoires Predict Antigen-Antibody Affinity

Author

Listed:
  • Lorenzo Asti
  • Guido Uguzzoni
  • Paolo Marcatili
  • Andrea Pagnani

Abstract

The immune system has developed a number of distinct complex mechanisms to shape and control the antibody repertoire. One of these mechanisms, the affinity maturation process, works in an evolutionary-like fashion: after binding to a foreign molecule, the antibody-producing B-cells exhibit a high-frequency mutation rate in the genome region that codes for the antibody active site. Eventually, cells that produce antibodies with higher affinity for their cognate antigen are selected and clonally expanded. Here, we propose a new statistical approach based on maximum entropy modeling in which a scoring function related to the binding affinity of antibodies against a specific antigen is inferred from a sample of sequences of the immune repertoire of an individual. We use our inference strategy to infer a statistical model on a data set obtained by sequencing a fairly large portion of the immune repertoire of an HIV-1 infected patient. The Pearson correlation coefficient between our scoring function and the IC50 neutralization titer measured on 30 different antibodies of known sequence is as high as 0.77 (p-value 10−6), outperforming other sequence- and structure-based models.Author Summary: Affinity maturation is a very complex biological process which enables activated B-cells to produce antibodies with increased affinity for a given antigen. Once B-cells begin to proliferate, each of the progeny cells introduces mutations in the antigen binding region in order to explore different affinities for the antigen. Selection rounds occurring in the so-called germinal centers in lymph nodes and spleen prune out poorly binding receptors and clonally expand good binders. Thanks to high-throughput sequencing techniques it is now possible to have access to a fairly representative sample (of the order of 105 to 106 sequences) of the immune repertoire of a given individual. Our approach is to first exploit this large amount of sequence data to infer a statistical model for the sequenced portion of the immune repertoire, and then to use the inferred probability of this model as a score when predicting the neutralization power of a given antibody sequence for the antigen of interest. The results we obtained on a specific data set of sequences of an HIV-1 patient show that our score correlates very well with experimentally assessed neutralization power of specific antibodies of known sequence. The performance of the method crucially relies on the ability of our model to account for long-range intragenic epistatic interactions between residues along the whole antibody chain.

Suggested Citation

  • Lorenzo Asti & Guido Uguzzoni & Paolo Marcatili & Andrea Pagnani, 2016. "Maximum-Entropy Models of Sequenced Immune Repertoires Predict Antigen-Antibody Affinity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004870
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004870
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004870
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004870&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004870?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carlo Baldassi & Marco Zamparo & Christoph Feinauer & Andrea Procaccini & Riccardo Zecchina & Martin Weigt & Andrea Pagnani, 2014. "Fast and Accurate Multivariate Gaussian Modeling of Protein Families: Predicting Residue Contacts and Protein-Interaction Partners," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-12, March.
    2. Christoph Feinauer & Marcin J Skwark & Andrea Pagnani & Erik Aurell, 2014. "Improving Contact Prediction along Three Dimensions," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-13, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pedro L Teixeira & Jeff L Mendenhall & Sten Heinze & Brian Weiner & Marcin J Skwark & Jens Meiler, 2017. "Membrane protein contact and structure prediction using co-evolution in conjunction with machine learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-24, May.
    2. Patrick Bryant & Gabriele Pozzati & Arne Elofsson, 2022. "Improved prediction of protein-protein interactions using AlphaFold2," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Erik van Nimwegen, 2016. "Inferring Contacting Residues within and between Proteins: What Do the Probabilities Mean?," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-10, May.
    4. Elena Facco & Andrea Pagnani & Elena Tea Russo & Alessandro Laio, 2019. "The intrinsic dimension of protein sequence evolution," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-16, April.
    5. Erik Aurell, 2016. "The Maximum Entropy Fallacy Redux?," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-7, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004870. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.