IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1002613.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Genome-Wide Localization of Protein-DNA Binding and Histone Modification by a Bayesian Change-Point Method with ChIP-seq Data

Author

Listed:
  • Haipeng Xing
  • Yifan Mo
  • Will Liao
  • Michael Q Zhang

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have matured considerably since their introduction and a focus has been placed on developing sophisticated analytical tools to deal with the amassing volumes of data. Chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq), a major application of NGS, is a widely adopted technique for examining protein-DNA interactions and is commonly used to investigate epigenetic signatures of diffuse histone marks. These datasets have notoriously high variance and subtle levels of enrichment across large expanses, making them exceedingly difficult to define. Windows-based, heuristic models and finite-state hidden Markov models (HMMs) have been used with some success in analyzing ChIP-seq data but with lingering limitations. To improve the ability to detect broad regions of enrichment, we developed a stochastic Bayesian Change-Point (BCP) method, which addresses some of these unresolved issues. BCP makes use of recent advances in infinite-state HMMs by obtaining explicit formulas for posterior means of read densities. These posterior means can be used to categorize the genome into enriched and unenriched segments, as is customarily done, or examined for more detailed relationships since the underlying subpeaks are preserved rather than simplified into a binary classification. BCP performs a near exhaustive search of all possible change points between different posterior means at high-resolution to minimize the subjectivity of window sizes and is computationally efficient, due to a speed-up algorithm and the explicit formulas it employs. In the absence of a well-established “gold standard” for diffuse histone mark enrichment, we corroborated BCP's island detection accuracy and reproducibility using various forms of empirical evidence. We show that BCP is especially suited for analysis of diffuse histone ChIP-seq data but also effective in analyzing punctate transcription factor ChIP datasets, making it widely applicable for numerous experiment types. Author Summary: To unravel the mechanisms of gene regulation, understanding the complex interplay of protein-DNA interactions is instrumental. Recently, chromatin immunoprecipitation, coupled with next-generation sequencing (ChIP-seq), has risen as the go-to technique for examining these interactions on a genome-wide scale. It has also given rise to new computational issues. One such difficulty is the large variation in read density profiles from different types of NGS data, including variable peak “shapes” ranging from punctate to diffuse enrichment segments. To address this issue, we developed an infinite-state hidden Markov model that resulted in explicit formulas for the estimation of read density enrichment and can be used to find both significant “peaks” and broad segments. We show the versatility of BCP in analyzing various ChIP-seq data, which can further our understanding of the role of transcription factors in gene regulatory networks and histone modification marks in epigenomic modulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Haipeng Xing & Yifan Mo & Will Liao & Michael Q Zhang, 2012. "Genome-Wide Localization of Protein-DNA Binding and Histone Modification by a Bayesian Change-Point Method with ChIP-seq Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-12, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1002613
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002613
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002613
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002613&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002613?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elizabeth G Wilbanks & Marc T Facciotti, 2010. "Evaluation of Algorithm Performance in ChIP-Seq Peak Detection," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(7), pages 1-12, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caiyan Jia & Matthew B Carson & Yang Wang & Youfang Lin & Hui Lu, 2014. "A New Exhaustive Method and Strategy for Finding Motifs in ChIP-Enriched Regions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, January.
    2. Anthony Mathelier & Wyeth W Wasserman, 2013. "The Next Generation of Transcription Factor Binding Site Prediction," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Weronika Sikora-Wohlfeld & Marit Ackermann & Eleni G Christodoulou & Kalaimathy Singaravelu & Andreas Beyer, 2013. "Assessing Computational Methods for Transcription Factor Target Gene Identification Based on ChIP-seq Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-11, November.
    4. Yuzhuo Wang & Chengzhi Zhang & Kai Li, 2022. "A review on method entities in the academic literature: extraction, evaluation, and application," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(5), pages 2479-2520, May.
    5. Timothy Bailey & Pawel Krajewski & Istvan Ladunga & Celine Lefebvre & Qunhua Li & Tao Liu & Pedro Madrigal & Cenny Taslim & Jie Zhang, 2013. "Practical Guidelines for the Comprehensive Analysis of ChIP-seq Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-8, November.
    6. Dongjun Chung & Dan Park & Kevin Myers & Jeffrey Grass & Patricia Kiley & Robert Landick & Sündüz Keleş, 2013. "dPeak: High Resolution Identification of Transcription Factor Binding Sites from PET and SET ChIP-Seq Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-13, October.
    7. Apratim Mitra & Jiuzhou Song, 2012. "WaveSeq: A Novel Data-Driven Method of Detecting Histone Modification Enrichments Using Wavelets," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-11, September.
    8. Tatsunori B Hashimoto & Matthew D Edwards & David K Gifford, 2014. "Universal Count Correction for High-Throughput Sequencing," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-11, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1002613. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.