IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1002335.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Protein Design Using Continuous Rotamers

Author

Listed:
  • Pablo Gainza
  • Kyle E Roberts
  • Bruce R Donald

Abstract

Optimizing amino acid conformation and identity is a central problem in computational protein design. Protein design algorithms must allow realistic protein flexibility to occur during this optimization, or they may fail to find the best sequence with the lowest energy. Most design algorithms implement side-chain flexibility by allowing the side chains to move between a small set of discrete, low-energy states, which we call rigid rotamers. In this work we show that allowing continuous side-chain flexibility (which we call continuous rotamers) greatly improves protein flexibility modeling. We present a large-scale study that compares the sequences and best energy conformations in 69 protein-core redesigns using a rigid-rotamer model versus a continuous-rotamer model. We show that in nearly all of our redesigns the sequence found by the continuous-rotamer model is different and has a lower energy than the one found by the rigid-rotamer model. Moreover, the sequences found by the continuous-rotamer model are more similar to the native sequences. We then show that the seemingly easy solution of sampling more rigid rotamers within the continuous region is not a practical alternative to a continuous-rotamer model: at computationally feasible resolutions, using more rigid rotamers was never better than a continuous-rotamer model and almost always resulted in higher energies. Finally, we present a new protein design algorithm based on the dead-end elimination (DEE) algorithm, which we call iMinDEE, that makes the use of continuous rotamers feasible in larger systems. iMinDEE guarantees finding the optimal answer while pruning the search space with close to the same efficiency of DEE. Availability: Software is available under the Lesser GNU Public License v3. Contact the authors for source code. Author Summary: Computational protein design is a promising field with many biomedical applications, such as drug design, or the redesign of new enzymes to perform nonnatural chemical reactions. An essential feature of any protein design algorithm is the ability to accurately model the flexibility that occurs in real proteins. In enzyme design, for example, an algorithm must predict how the designed protein will change during binding and catalysis. In this work we present a large-scale study of 69 protein redesigns that shows the necessity of modeling more realistic protein flexibility. Specifically, we model the continuous space around low-energy conformations of amino acid side chains, and compare it against the standard rigid approach of modeling only a small discrete set of low-energy conformations. We show that by allowing the side chains to move in the continuous space around low energy conformations during the protein design search, we obtain very different sequences that better match real protein sequences. Moreover, we propose a new protein design algorithm that, contrary to conventional wisdom, shows that we can search the continuous space around side chains with close to the same efficiency as algorithms that model only a discrete set of conformations.

Suggested Citation

  • Pablo Gainza & Kyle E Roberts & Bruce R Donald, 2012. "Protein Design Using Continuous Rotamers," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-15, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1002335
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002335
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002335
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002335&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002335?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Swati Jain & Jonathan D Jou & Ivelin S Georgiev & Bruce R Donald, 2017. "A critical analysis of computational protein design with sparse residue interaction graphs," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-30, March.
    2. Kyle E Roberts & Patrick R Cushing & Prisca Boisguerin & Dean R Madden & Bruce R Donald, 2012. "Computational Design of a PDZ Domain Peptide Inhibitor that Rescues CFTR Activity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-12, April.
    3. Anna U Lowegard & Marcel S Frenkel & Graham T Holt & Jonathan D Jou & Adegoke A Ojewole & Bruce R Donald, 2020. "Novel, provable algorithms for efficient ensemble-based computational protein design and their application to the redesign of the c-Raf-RBD:KRas protein-protein interface," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-27, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1002335. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.