IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1002256.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validation of Skeletal Muscle cis-Regulatory Module Predictions Reveals Nucleotide Composition Bias in Functional Enhancers

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew T Kwon
  • Alice Yi Chou
  • David J Arenillas
  • Wyeth W Wasserman

Abstract

We performed a genome-wide scan for muscle-specific cis-regulatory modules (CRMs) using three computational prediction programs. Based on the predictions, 339 candidate CRMs were tested in cell culture with NIH3T3 fibroblasts and C2C12 myoblasts for capacity to direct selective reporter gene expression to differentiated C2C12 myotubes. A subset of 19 CRMs validated as functional in the assay. The rate of predictive success reveals striking limitations of computational regulatory sequence analysis methods for CRM discovery. Motif-based methods performed no better than predictions based only on sequence conservation. Analysis of the properties of the functional sequences relative to inactive sequences identifies nucleotide sequence composition can be an important characteristic to incorporate in future methods for improved predictive specificity. Muscle-related TFBSs predicted within the functional sequences display greater sequence conservation than non-TFBS flanking regions. Comparison with recent MyoD and histone modification ChIP-Seq data supports the validity of the functional regions. Author Summary: For efficient identification of genomic sequences responsible for regulating gene expression, a number of computer programs have been developed for automatic annotation of these regulatory regions. We searched for potential regulatory regions responsible for controlling the expression of skeletal muscle-specific genes using these programs, and validated the predictions in a popular cell culture model for muscle. We were able to identify 19 previously uncharacterized regulatory regions for muscle genes. The accuracy of the predictions made by these programs leaves much to be desired, leading us to conclude that other signals in addition to the sequence information will be required to achieve sufficient predictive power for genome annotation. Genomic regions with confirmed regulatory function were compared against non-functional sequences, revealing sequence conservation, composition and chromatin modification properties as important signals in determining regulatory region functionality.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew T Kwon & Alice Yi Chou & David J Arenillas & Wyeth W Wasserman, 2011. "Validation of Skeletal Muscle cis-Regulatory Module Predictions Reveals Nucleotide Composition Bias in Functional Enhancers," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1002256
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002256
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002256&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002256?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Len A. Pennacchio & Nadav Ahituv & Alan M. Moses & Shyam Prabhakar & Marcelo A. Nobrega & Malak Shoukry & Simon Minovitsky & Inna Dubchak & Amy Holt & Keith D. Lewis & Ingrid Plajzer-Frick & Jennifer , 2006. "In vivo enhancer analysis of human conserved non-coding sequences," Nature, Nature, vol. 444(7118), pages 499-502, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Buki Kwon & Mervin M. Fansler & Neil D. Patel & Jihye Lee & Weirui Ma & Christine Mayr, 2022. "Enhancers regulate 3′ end processing activity to control expression of alternative 3′UTR isoforms," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Victor Lopez Soriano & Alfredo Dueñas Rey & Rajarshi Mukherjee & Frauke Coppieters & Miriam Bauwens & Andy Willaert & Elfride De Baere, 2024. "Multi-omics analysis in human retina uncovers ultraconserved cis-regulatory elements at rare eye disease loci," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Timothy H-C Hsiau & Claudiu Diaconu & Connie A Myers & Jongwoo Lee & Constance L Cepko & Joseph C Corbo, 2007. "The Cis-regulatory Logic of the Mammalian Photoreceptor Transcriptional Network," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(7), pages 1-16, July.
    4. Iksoo Huh & Isabel Mendizabal & Taesung Park & Soojin V Yi, 2018. "Functional conservation of sequence determinants at rapidly evolving regulatory regions across mammals," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, October.
    5. Mukta Kundu & Alexander Kuzin & Tzu-Yang Lin & Chi-Hon Lee & Thomas Brody & Ward F Odenwald, 2013. "cis-Regulatory Complexity within a Large Non-Coding Region in the Drosophila Genome," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-14, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1002256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.