IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1000850.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Threshold Equation for Action Potential Initiation

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan Platkiewicz
  • Romain Brette

Abstract

In central neurons, the threshold for spike initiation can depend on the stimulus and varies between cells and between recording sites in a given cell, but it is unclear what mechanisms underlie this variability. Properties of ionic channels are likely to play a role in threshold modulation. We examined in models the influence of Na channel activation, inactivation, slow voltage-gated channels and synaptic conductances on spike threshold. We propose a threshold equation which quantifies the contribution of all these mechanisms. It provides an instantaneous time-varying value of the threshold, which applies to neurons with fluctuating inputs. We deduce a differential equation for the threshold, similar to the equations of gating variables in the Hodgkin-Huxley formalism, which describes how the spike threshold varies with the membrane potential, depending on channel properties. We find that spike threshold depends logarithmically on Na channel density, and that Na channel inactivation and K channels can dynamically modulate it in an adaptive way: the threshold increases with membrane potential and after every action potential. Our equation was validated with simulations of a previously published multicompartemental model of spike initiation. Finally, we observed that threshold variability in models depends crucially on the shape of the Na activation function near spike initiation (about −55 mV), while its parameters are adjusted near half-activation voltage (about −30 mV), which might explain why many models exhibit little threshold variability, contrary to experimental observations. We conclude that ionic channels can account for large variations in spike threshold.Author Summary: Neurons communicate primarily with stereotypical electrical impulses, action potentials, which are fired when a threshold level of excitation is reached. This threshold varies between cells and over time as a function of previous stimulations, which has major functional implications on the integrative properties of neurons. Ionic channels are thought to play a central role in this modulation but the precise relationship between their properties and the threshold is unclear. We examined this relationship in biophysical models and derived a formula which quantifies the contribution of various mechanisms. The originality of our approach is that it provides an instantaneous time-varying value for the threshold, which applies to the highly fluctuating regimes characterizing neurons in vivo. In particular, two known ionic mechanisms were found to make the threshold adapt to the membrane potential, thus providing the cell with a form of gain control.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan Platkiewicz & Romain Brette, 2010. "A Threshold Equation for Action Potential Initiation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-16, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1000850
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000850
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000850
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000850&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000850?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hiroshi Kuba & Takahiro M. Ishii & Harunori Ohmori, 2006. "Axonal site of spike initiation enhances auditory coincidence detection," Nature, Nature, vol. 444(7122), pages 1069-1072, December.
    2. Lucy J Colwell & Michael P Brenner, 2009. "Action Potential Initiation in the Hodgkin-Huxley Model," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(1), pages 1-7, January.
    3. Björn Naundorf & Fred Wolf & Maxim Volgushev, 2006. "Unique features of action potential initiation in cortical neurons," Nature, Nature, vol. 440(7087), pages 1060-1063, April.
    4. Boris Gutkin & G. Bard Ermentrout, 2006. "Spikes too kinky in the cortex?," Nature, Nature, vol. 440(7087), pages 999-1000, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Skander Mensi & Olivier Hagens & Wulfram Gerstner & Christian Pozzorini, 2016. "Enhanced Sensitivity to Rapid Input Fluctuations by Nonlinear Threshold Dynamics in Neocortical Pyramidal Neurons," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-38, February.
    2. Benjamin M. Zemel & Alexander A. Nevue & Andre Dagostin & Peter V. Lovell & Claudio V. Mello & Henrique Gersdorff, 2021. "Resurgent Na+ currents promote ultrafast spiking in projection neurons that drive fine motor control," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cristina Rueda & Itziar Fernández & Yolanda Larriba & Alejandro Rodríguez-Collado, 2021. "The FMM Approach to Analyze Biomedical Signals: Theory, Software, Applications and Future," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-13, May.
    2. Go Ashida & Kazuo Funabiki & Jutta Kretzberg, 2015. "Minimal Conductance-Based Model of Auditory Coincidence Detector Neurons," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Robert C Cannon & Giampaolo D'Alessandro, 2006. "The Ion Channel Inverse Problem: Neuroinformatics Meets Biophysics," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(8), pages 1-8, August.
    4. Paul M Harrison & Laurent Badel & Mark J Wall & Magnus J E Richardson, 2015. "Experimentally Verified Parameter Sets for Modelling Heterogeneous Neocortical Pyramidal-Cell Populations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-23, August.
    5. Travis M Rotterman & Darío I Carrasco & Stephen N Housley & Paul Nardelli & Randall K Powers & Timothy C Cope, 2021. "Axon initial segment geometry in relation to motoneuron excitability," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-18, November.
    6. Skander Mensi & Olivier Hagens & Wulfram Gerstner & Christian Pozzorini, 2016. "Enhanced Sensitivity to Rapid Input Fluctuations by Nonlinear Threshold Dynamics in Neocortical Pyramidal Neurons," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-38, February.
    7. Ahmed A Aldohbeyb & Jozsef Vigh & Kevin L Lear, 2021. "New methods for quantifying rapidity of action potential onset differentiate neuron types," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-20, April.
    8. Contoyiannis, Yiannis F. & Kosmidis, Efstratios K. & Diakonos, Fotios K. & Kampitakis, Myron & Potirakis, Stelios M., 2022. "A hybrid artificial neural network for the generation of critical fluctuations and inter-spike intervals," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    9. Lior Tiroshi & Joshua A Goldberg, 2019. "Population dynamics and entrainment of basal ganglia pacemakers are shaped by their dendritic arbors," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-29, February.
    10. Lucy J Colwell & Michael P Brenner, 2009. "Action Potential Initiation in the Hodgkin-Huxley Model," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(1), pages 1-7, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1000850. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.