IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1000301.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding Pitch Perception as a Hierarchical Process with Top-Down Modulation

Author

Listed:
  • Emili Balaguer-Ballester
  • Nicholas R Clark
  • Martin Coath
  • Katrin Krumbholz
  • Susan L Denham

Abstract

Pitch is one of the most important features of natural sounds, underlying the perception of melody in music and prosody in speech. However, the temporal dynamics of pitch processing are still poorly understood. Previous studies suggest that the auditory system uses a wide range of time scales to integrate pitch-related information and that the effective integration time is both task- and stimulus-dependent. None of the existing models of pitch processing can account for such task- and stimulus-dependent variations in processing time scales. This study presents an idealized neurocomputational model, which provides a unified account of the multiple time scales observed in pitch perception. The model is evaluated using a range of perceptual studies, which have not previously been accounted for by a single model, and new results from a neurophysiological experiment. In contrast to other approaches, the current model contains a hierarchy of integration stages and uses feedback to adapt the effective time scales of processing at each stage in response to changes in the input stimulus. The model has features in common with a hierarchical generative process and suggests a key role for efferent connections from central to sub-cortical areas in controlling the temporal dynamics of pitch processing.Author Summary: Pitch is one of the most important features of natural sounds. The pitch sensation depends strongly on its temporal context, as happens, for example, in the perception of melody in music and prosody in speech. However, the temporal dynamics of pitch processing are poorly understood. Perceptual studies have shown that there is apparently a wide range of time scales over which pitch-related information is integrated. This multiplicity in perceptual time scales requires a trade-off between temporal resolution and temporal integration, which is not exclusive to pitch perception but applies to auditory perception in general. As far as we are aware, no existing model can account simultaneously for the wide range and stimulus-dependent nature of the perceptual phenomenology. This article presents a neurocomputational model, which explains the temporal resolution–integration trade-off observed in pitch perception in a unified fashion. The main contribution of this work is to propose that top-down, efferent mechanisms are crucial for pitch processing. The model replicates perceptual responses in a wide range of perceptual experiments not simultaneously accounted for by previous approaches. Moreover, it accounts quantitatively for the stimulus-dependent latency of the pitch onset response measured in the auditory cortex.

Suggested Citation

  • Emili Balaguer-Ballester & Nicholas R Clark & Martin Coath & Katrin Krumbholz & Susan L Denham, 2009. "Understanding Pitch Perception as a Hierarchical Process with Top-Down Modulation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(3), pages 1-15, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1000301
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000301
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000301&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000301?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sukhbinder Kumar & Klaas E Stephan & Jason D Warren & Karl J Friston & Timothy D Griffiths, 2007. "Hierarchical Processing of Auditory Objects in Humans," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(6), pages 1-9, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alejandro Tabas & Anita Siebert & Selma Supek & Daniel Pressnitzer & Emili Balaguer-Ballester & André Rupp, 2016. "Insights on the Neuromagnetic Representation of Temporal Asymmetry in Human Auditory Cortex," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Matevž Pesek & Aleš Leonardis & Matija Marolt, 2017. "Robust Real-Time Music Transcription with a Compositional Hierarchical Model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, January.
    3. Falk Lieder & Klaas E Stephan & Jean Daunizeau & Marta I Garrido & Karl J Friston, 2013. "A Neurocomputational Model of the Mismatch Negativity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-14, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alejandro Tabas & Anita Siebert & Selma Supek & Daniel Pressnitzer & Emili Balaguer-Ballester & André Rupp, 2016. "Insights on the Neuromagnetic Representation of Temporal Asymmetry in Human Auditory Cortex," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1000301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.